![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Eastern Sierra
Posts: 498
|
![]()
Pictures of the hulu
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
The blade does not look Javanese so the concepts of tangguh and dhapur do not apply.
IMO this kris originates from Sumatra but with mixed elements, the blade is old and probably from South Sumatra (not in sepokal style), and it does not match with the Bugis scabbard, and the hilt is in Jawa deman (shivering Javanese) style probably from Central Sumatra. Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Eastern Sierra
Posts: 498
|
![]()
Thank you Jean. Much appreciated. It seems I can grasp the symbolism and iconography a bit but how to describe a keris continues to elude me. I need a better library.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
By the way Marco Noris in his excellent book "Gods, demons, and ancestors - Art of Indonesian kris hilts" (page 16 & 17) attributes this style of JD hilt with spiralling eyes to South-West Sumatra and he may well be right. These hilts are found in several regions of Sumatra with minor variations only.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Eastern Sierra
Posts: 498
|
![]()
I do need to pick up books authored by our members. So much to read out there.
Jean, you mentioned a Bugis type scabbard. In modern terminology how does that differ from what Gardner called a Northern type that he said comes from Perak? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]() Quote:
Regards |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Eastern Sierra
Posts: 498
|
![]()
Thank you Jean. How does one tell the difference? Is it the presence of a lata in the op example?
Is the study of the keris is a game of cultural relativism and that if one is not native to a keris culture, to a certain extent, picking one culture as an anchor helps to interpret the deluge of information in the beginning? OR should one always view an object in relation to it's original culture. OPTION 3 Dualism. Compartmentalizing these opposing views in parallel interpretations of a work? This subject somehow reminds me of being in a conversations with a Spanish, a Portuguese, and an Italian speaker at once. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|