![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
![]()
The Conversion of St. Paul; c. 1600/01
This, and the next image, show a common subject for painters of Christian-era Europe. One can see some examples of armor components in this first painting. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
![]()
The Conversion of St. Paul; 1602
One can see a clearly represented hilt here with a simple, albeit large, side ring. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
![]()
The Taking of Christ; 1602
Here we can really start to see some of the detail portrayed in the representation of armor. I particularly like that the leather straps are clearly shown. The curl at the end is simply something that struck me as an extra touch of realism. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
![]()
The Sacrifice of Isaac; 1602/1603
I debated including this one as the knife shown is entirely simple. However, as the surviving examples we have from any historical period are those that skew toward the exceptional (and thus worth preserving through the ages), I felt it important to allow this humble tool be shown here. This may be considered a typical simple Italian shepherd's knife from the early 17th Century. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
![]()
The Crowning with Thorns; c. 1602/1603
Again, here is another good showing of armor. Additionally, I like that we see how one might wear their shirt with a cuirass. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
![]()
Here, there is not much in the way of weaponry displayed. The drawn rapier is mostly obscured. However, I included it to show the detail of the rapier frog, scabbard, and belt, as some may find that interesting.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
![]()
David with the Head of Goliath; c. 1606/1607
Remember when I mentioned the head of Goliath looks a bit like the painter himself? This is the first of two such renditions (see image dated 1609/1610 for the other). I'll let you judge of the likeness. As for the sword, even the fullering, the facets on the pommel, and some hints of additional decoration to the pommel are shown. This style may have been considered archaic by Caravaggio's time, and thus suitable to be used in a scene from antiquity. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|