![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2014 
				
				
				
					Posts: 924
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Here a date  ( 91 ?? ) - signature ? 
		
		
		
			On the basis of the blade and the chiseled scabbard  | 
| 
		
 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2014 
				
				
				
					Posts: 924
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Or read in this side : 
		
		
		
			Two arabic letters ? '' Ta '' + '' Ha ''? Initials of the owner ? the bladesmith ? ( + a picture of the nice horn hilt for share       )Kind regards  | 
| 
		
 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Ann Arbor, MI 
				
				
					Posts: 5,503
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			A plank connecting handle bosses is seen often on Turkish kindjals. Decorative element on the scabbard do not look Caucasian to me.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2014 
				
				
				
					Posts: 924
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hello Ariel, 
		
		
		
			Thank you for your comment ! So the ''flowers'' decoration scabbard can be ottoman/turkish ? I can explain what I found a little weird: when I looked for all silver/metal scabbard kindjal, I only found pieces combined with all silver/metal hilts. I saw this kind of hilt only associated with ''two chapes scabbards '' ( and leather or velvet in the middle )... So I thought about a kindjal not associated with his original scabbard... But the blade fits perfectly in and the reverse hilt decoration seems good too with the scabbard...  | 
| 
		
 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jun 2013 
				
				
				
					Posts: 2,145
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			First very nice piece 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	It's not Turkish and it's not rhino. IMHO  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Sep 2014 
				Location: Austria 
				
				
					Posts: 1,912
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			It is not Daghestani... 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	But that's about all I can say about it.  
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2016 
				Location: Jerusalem 
				
				
					Posts: 274
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi Fracatolin, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I am not an expert on Kindjals, but I have seen a few. This is a nice and authentic Kindjal, but it looks very Georgian to me, so not Ottoman or Persian. Especially the style of the decoration and mounting of the hilt, as well as blade all look like Tbilisi, late 19th c., but the latter is just a guess  
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2014 
				
				
				
					Posts: 924
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hello and thank you everybody for your comments, 
		
		
		
			It's not easy to age and fix a kindjal origin especially without clear stamps-marks..., ( except the two arabic letters ?? has anybody an idea ?    ... ) Always interesting to see the mix of cultural influences, The reverse of the scabbard make me too think it's a caucasian ( georgian ? ) model. I don't think it's rhino horn, nice light brown horn with reflects and fibrous structure but no translucence at all... I put other pictures of the hilt, who knows   !...
		 | 
| 
		
 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jun 2011 
				Location: Russia, Moscow 
				
				
					Posts: 379
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The scabbard is really similar to those made in Tbilisi, but the “markharay” ornament on the back says loudly that this is the work of a master from Dagestan (I am not in this field  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	  but I have the book “History of the Dagestan Ornament” by Paruk Debirov)The subject is very unusual. I think that the Kindjal is older than its scabbard, which were made by special order at the very end of the 19th or at the beginning of the 20th century. The chain was added somewhere in another country, not in the Caucasus.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |