![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Nik,
The blade and fittings are old (the scabbard bindings probably replaced later) - looks Tausug. Inlay is usually assumed to signify datu (or higher) status pieces. The brass here exhibits common motifs; coverage is quite a bit more extensive than usually seen. I hope the new owner will post more close-ups. Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
I also wonder if the grip wrap is a later replacement, though not as sure.
Yes wealthy non-datu warriors can have such pieces made as long as they do not do showy fittings above their station. As far as tribe is concerned, I would say at least the blade is Maguindanao (and possibly the scabbard as well). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,454
|
![]()
The quality of the hilt belies the fanciness of the blade, and I'm inclined to agree with Battara that the hilt may be an (old) replacement. This could be a Malay version of the kris rather than Moro.
Ian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
Ian, I was thinking that the inlay was a little different, though variations are common. However, the blade does not look Malay sundang to me. Also the scabbard looks more Moro than Malay to me.
Guess anything is possible though.......... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|