|  | 
|  | 
|  6th December 2019, 03:31 AM | #1 | |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2013 
					Posts: 2,145
				 |   Quote: 
 Persian??   | |
|   |   | 
|  6th December 2019, 12:36 PM | #2 | 
| Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Greenville, NC 
					Posts: 1,854
				 |   
			
			Thanks so much kwiatek!
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  6th December 2019, 09:15 PM | #3 | 
| Member Join Date: May 2019 
					Posts: 156
				 |   
			
			Thank you Kubur and CharlesS for posting your pieces. It‘s great to see new things and to learn! I think faqir here means “poor” rather than “dervish”, though you’re right that it could have that meaning. It’s quite common for artisans to sign things with a self-deprecating adjective such as “poor” or “humble” or to call themselves “servant” or “slave”. And yes definitely Shi’i! | 
|   |   | 
|  7th December 2019, 02:35 AM | #4 | 
| Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Ann Arbor, MI 
					Posts: 5,503
				 |   
			
			Yes, Shia. My guess , this pseudo-shashka was not made in Afghanistan by the local Shia, Hazara or Quizilbash. Afghani-made weapons are usually simple and pretty crude. I would guess it came from Iran, where there are significant diasporas of both tribes. Shia Muslims were persecuted in Afghanistan and emigrated in droves. Just to mention wholesale slaughter and displacement of Hazaras by Abdurrahman in the early 1890s: it is claimed that fully half of their population were killed by government forces. In Iran they settled in Khorasan, a famed arms- manufacturing province. That might explain the sophistication of that sword. | 
|   |   | 
|  7th January 2024, 12:19 AM | #5 | |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2021 
					Posts: 77
				 |   Quote: 
 In the late 19th century many of these cutlers were Bukharans who settled in Kabul- their main clientele at this point would have been Afghan Army officers who wanted a fancy private purchase sword as opposed to their bland government issued piece. | |
|   |   | 
|  7th January 2024, 11:32 AM | #6 | |
| Member Join Date: Apr 2023 
					Posts: 127
				 |   Quote: 
 I don’t think this is the work of Bukhara masters who worked in Kabul. Usually masters from Bukhara used their own techniques for decorating weapons. I recently read the article "Arms decoration features in Khanates of Central Asia": https://www.academia.edu/105977932/A...Y_20TH_CENTURY The technique of decorating this shashka is completely different from the techniques used by Bukhara masters. But I completely agree with your opinion that many Afghan Army officers wanted a fancy private purchase sword. | |
|   |   | 
|  15th January 2024, 06:52 AM | #7 | 
| Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 
					Posts: 10,661
				 |  Shaska......Afghan or Uzbek? 
			
			This was a great discussion, and fascinating topics. Over 20 years ago, I was able to get this shashka, which in the auction in London was described as from Uzbekistan.  In subsequent research and discussion with Torben Flindt, it was inconclusive whether this was indeed Uzbek, or actually Afghan. It was he who said wisely, 'weapons have NO geographic boundaries'. This example has the same distinctive long fluted chape on the scabbard seen on many paluoars, so that of course leans to Afghan. I hope possible the members here might add their insights, and what about this example might lean to either Uzbekistan or Afghanistan. I would presume this is late 19th c? Any comments on the calyx extending at back of grip ferrule as per Khyber knives etc.? | 
|   |   | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |