![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 57
|
![]()
Ariel and Ibrahiim,
You both have a good eye, or at least good intuition. I received a few things after this that I was a bit more excited about, and I forgot about my initial thoughts on looking at it. The blade does look like on wootz on close examination in some parts. I think I'll have to polish and etch a small portion, soon. Assad Ullah style might be too optimistic, and this cartouche seems to be more angular and less round than Assad Ullah's. The ears are not uncomfortable in the hand; they taper well. I didn't provide a good shot of the finials, but I think they are supposed to look like the bottom half of an elephant's open mouth. At least that was my impression when I saw them in person. The workmanship on the hilt is not going to make it into the next edition of Hindu Arms and Ritual! I think I need to take another look at how the hilt is assembled and to what extent it is original. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]()
Indian shamshir blades rarely present the characteristic Indian ricasso. That is a characteristic of the tulwar blades. However, this blade a ppears to have a rudimentary Indian ricasso.
In my oppinion this is an Indian, not Persian blade. Why?! It is wider at the ricasso than the typical Persian blade. Connected to the wider ricasso is the more tapering of the blade towards the tip. So, to my eyes, this looks like a transition blade between a classic shamshir shape and that of a tulwar. Also the location of the inscriptions appears to be lower, more towards the tip, and is not of typical Persian shape. With regards to the hilt, I believe it to be a more recent, very poor, touristy, replacement. Late 19th century, but most likely early 20th... Why?! The blade is not hilted properly. The ricasso does not go up inside the hilt, but it ends up right before the hilt, meaning that at the joint zone the blade is only supported by the narrow tang and very prone to breakage. So, in the condition it is fit now, this blade cannot serve as a fighting weapon. My two cents... ![]() Last edited by mariusgmioc; 21st October 2019 at 11:25 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 57
|
![]()
Thank you Marius. And I have your etching guide bookmarked.
I must shamefully admit that the poor hilt is what caught my touristy eye ![]() For the price I paid, I'm satisfied with an older, wootzy blade and a late kitschy (at best) hilt. Your two cents shall be deposited in an interest bearing account of knowledge! In the meantime, I will try not to get into any sword fights. With this sword. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
i don't like to be negative with any forum member.
But here there is no discussion, the hilt is a touristic late stuff. With the ears nailed and the trump in the air! With the camel bone i would be tempted to put this art work in the chicken street of Kabul. The blade looks good. If the blade is good, throw the hilt to the bin and buy a nice tulwar or pulwar hilt... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
This shamshir has been put up at one famous auction several times over the past two or three years
![]() I think it caused potential buyers a lot of questions if they didn’t buy it for a long time .... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]() Quote:
From your photos, it appears that the blade has indeed some rudimentary Indian ricasso. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]() Quote:
The interesting and potentially valuable part is the blade. If it is wootz-y, then the money was well spent. The handle could have been attached yesterday or 200 years ago: they were easy to change and virtually all really old Indian swords are on their second or fourth. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 57
|
![]() Quote:
![]() The challenge for me, of course, is that it's a lot easier to learn about good stuff in books than the cheap looking stuff that would never make it into the books and which is easier to access. The forums are a better place to learn why some inexpensive stuff is crap and why other inexpensive stuff has some redeemable qualities, than spending years accumulating crap before buying something nice and realizing that you've only spent years collecting garbage. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Do not beat yourself up: everybody here went thru the same period. We all have our " walls of shame" ( more precisely boxes in dark rooms).
View it as a price of learning. On top of that, if the blade is wootz, you got a winner. Changing the handle is simple, and a wootz pulwar will look gorgeous. Locals did it all the time, so you will continue the time-honored tradition:-) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|