![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
I think it's entirely possible Jose.
Doesn't look like natural aging to me at all. If there were evidence of tiny pits I'd think it was a casting that was hand finished. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 51
|
![]() Quote:
I don't think it's a casting. material seems more like antler or bone. The selut attachted is from metal. I don't see evidence of tiny pits. If it is aged it was very professionally made (blackened cavities, etc.) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
|
![]()
Patje, I think I'd be inclined to do a hot needle test with this hilt.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]() Quote:
Another clue you gave was the impression of heavyness and being cool to the touch. Then there is the matter of all the 'gunk' in the crevices. When I was first collecting kerisses I received a very intricate Madura hilt; it too felt heavy and cool to the touch also with lots of gunk in the crevices. I figured I would clean it up and in doing so discovered it was a casting made from some kind of heavy non natural material and aged quite professionally. I'll be interested in what you discover when you do a bit of testing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|