![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Arizona
Posts: 42
|
![]()
Understood and thank you, I am beginning to enjoy the research part of understanding the history of some of these artifacts.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]()
Yes, most likely Daghestani.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Arizona
Posts: 42
|
![]()
Thank you.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
At that time Vladikavkaz became a very important center of manufacture of Caucasian weapons. Large workshops ( Omarov, Guzunov, Mudunov, Koshtoyants et al) and multiple smaller establishments employed masters from all over Caucasus and Transcaucasia. They utilized a variety of ornamentations irrespective of the ethnic origin of the maker and only names or probirer stamps can pinpoint the origin of the weapon.
Well, weapon is an overstatement: a lion share were sold as souvenirs and decorative costume trinkets. Even Kubachi and Tiflis acquired industrial strength and the ethnic characters of ornamentations were lost. Buyers simply chose what style they wished to have and the shops had them all. Blue jeans, formerly an idiosyncratic American garb, nowadays are made all over the world, from Vietnam to Guatemala and Ukraine. Most of the erstwhile Druze Majjali daggers were made in large Syrian cities. Industrial globalization did not start yesterday. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,459
|
![]() Quote:
Very well said Ariel, The study of ethnographic weapons is probably one of the greatest conundrums ever because of this very phenomenon, the commercial production of ethnic weapons as souvenirs and tourist curiosities. During the colonial eras of major powers, people became intrigued by these kinds of items brought back by occupying forces and the stage was set. As noted, the upswing in production of such items which were produced to simulate styles and character of the decoration on the originals and their intricate meanings were gradually lost through diffused interpretation. With Caucasian weapons they are inherently attractive and exotic, so their beauty remains compelling, but for ethnographic arms historians, the challenges are formidable. While Ariel and a number of others who often write here are indeed powerful authorities on these arms, one of the best sources I know which can help in better understanding them for the rest of us is the book by Kirill Rivkin, "Arms and Armor of the Caucusus". |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Jim,
With all due respect, it is not “one of the”, it is “THE”. Kirill forgot more about Caucasian weapons than all of us here know...... And his recent book about the evolution of the Eastern sword is an academic masterpiece. I admire him. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
With all due respect, it is “one of the”.
Kirill's book is really great but I prefer Lebedynsky. And completely disagree about the book on the evolution of the Eastern sword.With four pages of references (and half in Russian), it's not an academic masterpiece. I was very disapointed by this book. I agree with most of the theories and ideas of the author, but the book is more a like a discussion that you can find on this forum. Lot of opinions without historical evidences. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
You are certainly entitled to your opinion.
Just like I to mine. Taking into account that a good part of the book is dedicated to the nomadic swords, most of which are located in what is now Caucasus, Russia and Ukraine, it is not a miracle that many references are from local archeologists. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|