![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 514
|
![]()
It is a decorative reproduction. No proof plug and note that the triangles do not actually interlock, as a proper display of it would. These are two things that jump out but the deep blade etch another primary fault.
Likely Chinese made and fairly modern. Cheers GC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,664
|
![]()
Am I the only one who sees an Afghan crest on this blade?
Teodor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 514
|
![]() Quote:
![]() How about this "British" blade |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,298
|
![]()
BONK!!!!
Teodor….brilliant!!!! How did we miss that ? ![]() That is indeed the Afghan state crest , the Mosque at Mazir I Sharif! Afghanistan it is. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Belgium
Posts: 52
|
![]()
Waaaaw !!!!! Congratulations Teodor ;-)
Hi Theodor, congratulations for your discovery !!!!! :-) I think you changed a big question mark into a beautiful discovery :-) Great !!!!! Respect from Belgium ;-) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Belgium
Posts: 52
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks and bravo once again !!! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,298
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you very much Belgian! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,399
|
![]()
The Afghan attribution seems to be correct. This afternoon I was sent pictures of a similar sword by one of the many sword enthusiasts who come to this site anonymously. The sword has the mark of the Afghan armory as well, and shows similar deep chiseling along the blade. The pictures were sent to me with a note that this is a late 19th C. Afghan officer's sword.
Perhaps this thread might be better served in the Ethno Forum. Ian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 514
|
![]()
Foot in mouth?
Enjoy ![]() GC The Emirate of Afghanistan 1823-1926 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...926%29.svg.png most similar but still missing the middle flag 1901-1919 with cannon and swords I still don't see it as true The thing is that none higher would be a very Muslim thing and certainly, a flag would not be. Whatever. Last edited by Hotspur; 15th November 2018 at 08:52 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,664
|
![]()
GC,
I agree with you that this is not a European sword blade, and most definitely not a Wilkinson blade. The Afghans were very adept at making copies, there are articles on this forum explaining how they were able to reverse engineer Martinis and even Mauser C96s. The one thing they did not always get quite right were the European markings, as the craftsmen copying those simply did not understand them. What I see here is an interesting Afghan military sword, made most likely in the early 20th century. To me this is an example of local craftsmanship and outside (in this particular instance British) influence in a time, when the Afghan army was transitioning and modernizing. A search in the ethnographic section will produce examples of the Mosque at Mazar-i-Sharif marking applied to traditional Afghan arms, if I remember correctly to denote that they belonged to the Khan's arsenal in Kabul. Teodor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 514
|
![]() Quote:
Cheers GC |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,664
|
![]() Quote:
I have seen Afghan shashkas with Toledo made blades (early 20th century Toledo manufacture) and so it is entirely possible that this is a European made blade. One would expect to see some manufacturer's marks on a European blade though. Is it also possible that someone in China decided to make a copy of a British sword, but for whatever reason copied from an old Afghan military sword, which would be quite funny, and also unlikely, at least in my opinion. Teodor Last edited by TVV; 15th November 2018 at 10:43 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,298
|
![]() Quote:
Exactly!! Perfectly explained and 100% agree. The skills of the Afghans in arms production is astonishing.........and as noted, many arms are well made copies but the markings often are readily discernible as non authentic. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Belgium
Posts: 52
|
![]() Quote:
Here is what I could find and I can assure you that these are authentic British swords from 1865 - 1905. Photos 1: 1865-1875 Rifle Man Officer Photo 2: Infantry Officer before 1892 Photo 3: Georges V WWI Period King Photo 4: Royal Army Medical Officer 1905 Photo 5: Advertisement for British Thurkle swords in 1901 You see that the Chinese are not the only ones to place the "proof test" star against the edges of the blade or not centered. May be they were inspired by the excellent British manufacturers in the nineteenth century ;-) Kind regards from Belgium (Pictures are kept from the excellent web site: Easton Antique Arms and I thank him for his nice work) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|