![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,229
|
![]()
I'm not so sure i see a Bugis blade when i look at this keris Athanase. What about it make you identify it as Bugis?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 420
|
![]()
I confess that I mainly based on the dress of the keris, but also on the solid and massive aspect of the blade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 420
|
![]()
After reflection, the blade does not have the hexagonal section typical of keris Bugis but rather a rhombic section that would be more reminiscent of penisular keris.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 188
|
![]()
My first instinct when I saw the blade was Sumatra, but I could be wrong.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
Please see a quite similar blade (15 shallow luks, poorly carved sogokan, etc.) initially fitted on a Balinese kris! My guess about its origin is Sumbawa or Sumatra.
Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
The hilt from Athanase has a more erect and compact shape than the pangulu rekko style hilts from Sulawesi, and looks like a mix of pangulu and Jawa demam style hilts. The origin of these hilts may be East Sumatra (see another specimen) or possibly Sumbawa.
Regards Last edited by Jean; 1st July 2018 at 09:12 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 420
|
![]()
Thank you very much Jean.
![]() So it's probably a Keris from Sumatra (maybe East Sumatra). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|