![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Great!!!
Many thanks! This is a wonderful reference for this and future discussions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
Yes, the Hamza is very important if you want to study Indian weapons, beiing from the 16th century, and it shows a lot of different wepons, besides from telling a very special story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 143
|
I know this is an old thread , and ive kept this sword for some time, recently i have been informed by a few sword collectors that the sword in a piso pondang , sumatra and not indian !
whats your thoughts, is this right and how can we tell ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: France
Posts: 209
|
I think you right with the piso podang assumption !
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
|
If I may suggest, just search for "chenangkas" and go to the thread "Piso Podang Batak or Borneo?" from 2011 please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
We seem to have a difference of opinions: nothing unusual in this field. I rely in Hamza Nama, Elgood, Brian Isaak and Jens. Personally, I could not think of better sources of info. But yours might be correct, too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: France
Posts: 209
|
Gustav is maybe right too !
Hard choice
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|