![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
Nice art work and pamor Lawe Satukel but I won't call it a Minang blade....
Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 205
|
![]()
New artistic design but not my cup of tea.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,229
|
![]()
I would have to agree that despite drawing references from Minangkabau style naga keris, you can't really call this one and i don't believe anyone looking at it with any knowledge of that style would think it was. If it truly was you intention to own a keris that could be identified as Minang i don't believe this is it.
However, what you have had created by your Madurese smith is an attractive modern "art" keris that seems to have some decent craftsmanship behind it. Like Paul i would say this is not my "cuppa", but i can appreciate the work that went into it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
I like it.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 372
|
![]()
Alexish, if this is what you asked them to make then I think they have done an admirable job. It may not fit with the classics but the garap (workmanship) on the blade looks good, the pamor well controlled and the sheath nicely carved. Enjoy your keris.
Drd |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
|
![]()
If I am not completely mistaken, we have seen at least two Kerisses of this maker on forum before, both Malela blades. He surely is improving.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,347
|
![]()
For what it's worth, and only my point of view:
Garish is a word I might use to describe this end product. For me his effort begs the question; who designates what is the proper form of a traditional Keris? Should this be considered a product of the keris culture as is known at present? If it is: Where are the parameters? Where do we go from here? Have we discarded the Kraton dapurs' guidance for bling? When this happens are we, in fact, cheapening the end product culturally and spiritually? I have always equated the form of a Keris with Haiku; there are rules; if you don't meet them in the composition; then it is not Haiku. I evaluate the keris's I see within the same type of parameters. I feel that the new improvisations we see too often these days are not really improvements; rather they are distractions from the ideal. In essence: What actually constitutes a proper keris? Last edited by Rick; 4th March 2018 at 05:17 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|