![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Roland,
The workmanship doesn't strike me as Chinese nor SE Asia. Quote:
The number doesn't strike me as anything sensible to do to a working blade (with the outer margin of the first number coming close to the [hardened?] edge); thus, I'd go for a later addition (and musea as well as collectors are known to have done dumb things to their pieces)! Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 755
|
![]()
The sword looks like you would imagine a moor pirate sword to look like. The man-in-the-moon suggests that it’s not Islamic but European. The number 1748 looks like it was stamped into the sword rather than engraved. Could it be to commemorate the year in which this weapon was captured by its owner? There seem to have been a number of British-Spanish engagements in that year and it seems to have been when the Austrian War of Succession ended.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
![]() Quote:
Best, Roland Quote:
Roland Quote:
Tang and blade seems to be made of one kind of steel, no scarf welded techniques. In the next days I will make a test with my salt to bring out the pattern, which hopefully gives more certainty. I tend to believe as it was said in the comments, it seems to be a European Falchion/Malchus. Roland |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Any more ideas, Gentlemen ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
![]() Quote:
the blade seems to be in the right forum now. To get more safety I'm going to check the blade with etchant. If the result is good enough I will show the pattern. I would expect sheer steel on a late Medieval European blade. Roland |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,166
|
![]()
One other possibility...Numbers of this type were not always dates, commemarative or 'rack/unit' numbers, but symbolic/magical in a sense, I can't remember the word! (
![]() Mark |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|