![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 755
|
![]()
Many thanks for your comments, Pukka Bundook and Rick.
The maker of this rifle knew what he was doing. The absence of decorations indicates a military purpose. Despite this, it has an aestetic appeal which is further enhanced by the patina. I’m more of a sword than gun collector, but think this rifle deserves to be kept. I probably had it now for closer to 30 years than the 20 previously stated. Will probably look to mount it on the wall. Someone told me muskets are smooth bored and can’t have rifled barrels, so I guess this one is properly called a rifle. It’s octagonal in shape, and not hexagonal as stated on the original shop ticker. One strange thing is that it doesn’t have attachements for a sling to hang over the shoulder. Maybe it would have been carried in a holster or something else instead. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,632
|
![]()
Hi Victrix
"Generally" the term rifle is used to describe a shoulder gun with a rifled barrel. And barrels with smooth bores are often referred to as muskets, or long guns. Of course the term long gun could be used to describe any type of shoulder gun. The terms are sometimes used interchangeably. That your's lacks any sling swivals is not that unusual. Many of these Jazails were made without trigger guards. The quality of barrels, locks, and decoration (if any) varied greatly as can be seen from surviving specimens. Often these guns utilized a minimum of parts just assembled or cobbled together to make something that would shoot. While others had more attention to their build quality. Your's appears to be built as a simple, solid "work" rifle that's definately seen plenty of action, but not abused. I notice the forged ramrod with the somewhat squared/flattened end with a slot for a cleaning patch. Looks very sturdy like the rest of the gun. Often these ramrods are missing. So yes, this should make a nice, authentic display with your collection. Rick |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() Quote:
The musketeers are originally soldiers with these long guns. Later they became famous with another kind of weapon... the rapier... Some people call a musket any rifle before the 19th c. percussion lock... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: AUCKLAND,NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 627
|
![]()
Hi Victrix
Am posting my Jezail which has similar butt like your Rifle, but mine is made for non military use and has mother of pearl decoration on the butt and behind lock Regards Rajesh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 755
|
![]()
Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for posting pics of your Jezail. It’s a flintlock is it not? The butt is similar shape as you note. I plan to attach my Jezail to the wall in a similar way. I had the idea that my Jezail could have been ordered locally in India/Pakistan/Afghanistan by a British Army officer stationed there and brought home to England with him? Windsor Caste is within walking distance of Eton and there are troops stationed there. That could explain the solid look of functionality and lack of decorations, i.e. more in Northern European taste? Regards, Last edited by Victrix; 23rd January 2018 at 09:45 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
Victrix,
Rather than ordered by an officer, many were simply picked up after campaigns and brought back as keepsakes. England seemed to be half full of ethnic stuff when I was a boy! Vast amounts came home with returning soldiers. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Hello
Just to say that the lock is not a regulatory lock, the word TOWER and the date, 1870 do not correspond to any regulatory weapon, and has been set for propaganda. The same for the royal crown. that has no figure of the ruling monarch. The same happened in many copies of the Enfield, produced by English and Belgian gunsmiths, to be sold, for example, to both contenders in the American War of Secession, and then sold to the South American countries in the Paraguay War. Affectionately. Fernando K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 755
|
![]()
Many thanks, Fernando. Nice to get some facts in after all the speculations!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: AUCKLAND,NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 627
|
![]() Quote:
I bought my jezail for England,Regards Rajesh |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,789
|
![]() Quote:
To answer the question that you posed to Bandook....yes his is a flintlock, but with the top jaw missing from the cock. Rick mentions above that these were often made without trigger guards. Here are a couple of pics of one I have made without a guard. Stu |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 755
|
![]()
Hi Stu,
Nice one! I prefer flintlocks before percussion myself. In terms of collectible items at least ![]() What confuses me somewhat is that I feel my Jezail looks quite European apart from the butt. Yours look quite oriental just about everywhere. It could be that with the flintlocks your Jezails might be older and have more native appearance because foreign influences were yet to make inroads. Or as I suggested before, a local gunsmith might have customized my Jezail for a British Army client on order? If he wanted to take one back home to England with him he might have asked them to leave the traditional decorations off? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|