1st January 2018, 05:34 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#1
			
		 | 
	
	| 
			
			 Vikingsword Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: The Aussie Bush 
				
				
					Posts: 4,519
				 
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
				 
				Unreliable gunpowder and variation in powder flask sizes
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		| 
			
				 
					Originally Posted by Philip
					
				 
				 The size differential [between European and Moroccan flasks] could be due to the necessity of [the latter] using more powder  in a load when the powder was weak.  There exists a 1916 report by a  French intelligence officer identified as Capt. Delhomme, entitled "Les  armes dans le Sous Occidental" which describes the armament used by  tribal peoples in Morocco, and his comments on gunpowder are  interesting.  Dehomme noted that powder was manufactured at various  locales and that its quality was not consistent.  The quality varied  considerably from here to there.  The overall market seemed to be rife  with shoddy product made from inferior or adulterated materials, such as  unrefined sulfur or sugar carbon (instead of proper charcoal).  Powder  made from the latter was weak and unstable, losing whatever potency it  had after a couple months. 
   
  The report, in English summary, can be read in S. James Gooding's  article "The Snaphance Muskets of al-Maghreb al-Aqsa" in the journal Arms Collecting, Vol 34, No. 3, pp 87-93. 
   
  The vagaries of unreliable supplies of good powder may also explain the  preference for very long barrels, since the poor stuff was likely to be  much slower-burning and thus it would be advantageous for the bullet to  remain confined a bit longer to allow sufficient combustion pressure to  build before it left the muzzle.   Likewise the tendency of native  firearms in some tropical areas to have excessively long barrels (by  Western standards) due to the moisture-absorbing nature of the charcoal  in gunpowder, affecting its performance in humid climates. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 As noted, this is indeed worthy of a new thread. 
  
 Ian.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
	
		 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 |