![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Dear Pukka
What he manifests is imaginative. there is no record of the successive transformations. Affectionately. Fernando K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Although tocayo, this is not the first time i hear about 'successive' modifications. I confess that this 'diagnosis' i once received for a pistol of mine was doubtful for me, but ...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Dear namesake
Of course, there are transformations. But in this case it is not theory, it must be demonstrated based on elements that are mentioned and that can be seen in the piece ... A hug Fernando K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
Fernando K, my dear friend,
At times I am baffled by our use of a common language, To me, it means one thing, to others something very different. I will try again to say what I mean, and will thereafter in this case, "forever hold my peace". ![]() What I have to say it this; The lock and barrel have the same patina. The cock and frizzen And pan appear to not have this same patina, they look cleaner and newer to me. Not brand new, but newer.. The pan still has the milling marks on the inside. To me, this can mean that these parts are Possibly replacements. I will not go into Why they would be replaced, but logic dictates that they were either damaged or missing. There my friend. I have done my best, and must leave it now. I hope to at least to be understandable in what I say, and will not fall out if we disagree. ![]() ![]() I am not saying I am right, this is just what I think. Kind regards, Richard. Last edited by Pukka Bundook; 12th November 2017 at 01:26 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,633
|
![]()
Hi Cerjak.
WOW!!! What a beautiful pistol !! And a real curiosity. It has styling cues of both earlier and later periods. Which is actually common for pistols made in/for the Eastern market. But this one is exceptional. The decoration, with it's face masks on the lock plate and barrel look like a mix of English and Indian. So the final assembly possibly in India may be as good a guess as any. The spurios "variation" of the Twigg name makes me think the pistol was not assembled in Europe. It does seem this pistol was commissioned for a specific customer. And the workmanship is top notch. The lock is very high quality, and certainly up to European snuff. I notice it has the bridless pan, an earlier feature. As Richard mentions, I too can see the difference in patina of the hammer, pan, frizzen, and even the frizzen spring. If they were replaced, it was certainly a first class job. The face of the frizzen looks like it has never seen a flint struck against it. Curious. But the one photo showing the vent hole does not, to me, look like the barrel had been altered previously. And the vent hole sits at the perfect position above the pan. Just my observations. Again, it's a beautiful and super interesting pistol. Rick |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,633
|
![]()
One other small item.
Notice the barrel tang screw, and lock plate screws are all pointed in the same direction. This was a common practice of the best gunmakers in the period. Rick |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
![]()
Hi Rick
Thank you again for your comment, About the barrel I can confirm you that the vent hole is not altered and so like you I believe that this pistol is not re-converted into flintlock. Best Cerjak |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|