![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#34 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Europe 
				
				
					Posts: 2,718
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Looking at old threads I found this one. 
		
		
		
			Roland, the katar you show in thread 22 must be from the same place as the ones with protrusions. Unfortunately I have not had time yet to dig into this subject, but when I have I will write more about it. Eric, The katar Sotheby's refer to, from the David Collection in 1982 is thai one. See my catalogue pp. 127-128. Well Eric, there are differences. Have a look at the one Roland shows without protrusions, the one you show, and the one I show. The protrusions are clearly shown on the one I show, but on the one you show the protrusions are a 'lump' - more or less. I also have some of these katars, and I am wondering how they came from being clearly shown to being a 'lump' and dissapear at all. I think that more katars belong to this group - but research will show. Last edited by Jens Nordlunde; 21st October 2017 at 10:23 PM.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
		
  | 
	
		
  |