|
|
|
19th March 2006, 05:17 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
In a way you are both correct (according to Shelford's definition).
Dajak's comment on the Jimpul not ending in a point is found on all Jimpul. And Henk's comment on the finger-guard protrusion is usually found on a Jimpul. But it's not a "must be there" like Dajak's "non-point". Michael Last edited by VVV; 19th March 2006 at 05:38 PM. |
|
|
|
19th March 2006, 05:36 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
And here is another ex-Coppen's, the one on page 73 far right.
Michael |
|
|
|
|
19th March 2006, 08:09 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
Look at the finger guard how can this hold your finger .
by the way an exxelent Jimpul This one was in my friend Richards collection. look at these pics none off them is a Jimpul so the crowit makes not that it is a jimpul. The parang Ilang is pictured in the book Quer Durch Borneo 1894 page 150 but has a crowit to Henk schould this be a Jimpul. The other one Is a langgai Tingai but according to Henk it is a Jimpul. So this explains why I am saying the crowit makes it not a Jimpul. And by the pics you can see I am right A Jimpul has a crowit and the the strange end it needs both to be a jimpul . |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
