![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 18
|
![]()
Many thanks to Ian and Andrew,
I was indeed under the impression that this dagger wasn't really meant for heavy duty, unless in dire circumstances, but more for appearances (good ones at that, I'd say, I find it very elegant in shape and design), and you confirm that. Thanks also for the references, which I'll try and look up. ![]() Guy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 372
|
![]()
Hi Guy
I have attached image of another type of Burmese knife/dha. This one is very solidly made and the hilt is a large piece of ivory. The decorative style is quite different although it comes from the same region. I suspect this is a little older than your piece but wiser folk may care to set me right on this. I have posted a picture of this on the board before. cheers David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
I agree, this one is older. Perhaps late 19th century, or early 20th.
I think these are a distinctly different form of knife. Generally, the quality of these are better than the "Shan" knives we were discussing earlier in the thread. These are distinct with the rounded, slightly down-tilted handles, single ferules and tapering scabbards. I've seen knives of this form reliably attributed to Burma (Burmese writing along with silver koftgari on the blade). Enough that I'd suggest this form is Burman. However, others, of substantially similar form, have been reported as Thai and, I believe the scabbards like your example demonstrate Chinese decorative motifs. Perhaps Puff could comment on this? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|