![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Sep 2012 
				Location: Surabaya - Indonesia 
				
				
					Posts: 199
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 oddly it is the invasion of Pamekasan who got more recognition here's a translation for you all in the beginning of islamic kingdoms era, Madura is a region, ruled by semi-independent kingdoms under Demak. Such example is Pamekasan, which ruled by Ronggosukowati. During his reign Pamekasan faced invasion by Balinese kingdom. The reason behind the Invasion was because Madura helped Demak attacked Hindu Blambangan kingdom, of which Balinese proclaim as their ancestor. This invasion is kinda weird, because it was much easier for Bali to invade Java (Demak) rather than set sail to invade Madura, which is considerably farther one theory is Balinese thought that Madura is an important hub spot, which must be conquered before attacking other areas in Java coastline. According to A. Sulaiman Sadik, Balinese warriors also attacking other areas in Madura. In Pamekasan, they punctured deep into enemy territory by using riverways. They tied (Acangcang in Madurese) their boats (jung in Madurese) in the estuary area is now known as Jhungcangcang village (village of tied boats). story goes on that Balinese army were met by Pamekasan army and Balinese army were defeated. Survivors asked for pardon and were allowed to live on the surrounding area. Until now, there are still descendants of Balinese warriors who lived in Jhungcancang village area. Similar defeat also happened in Sumenep area, also known as Ghirpapas war Donny  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 7,085
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks for filling that in Donny. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I was given it by a relative who was living in Sumenep in the 1980's, he took me out to a place near the port and showed me a place where he reckoned they landed. Its a good story, some of it might even be true.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2009 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,740
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			A similar blade and a similar scabbard as those shown by Athanase. 
		
		
		
			Regards  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2016 
				Location: Paris (France) 
				
				
					Posts: 428
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thank you all for your valuable information.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	  I have a little question : With the bondolan hilt, I keep the Javanese mendak or not?  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2009 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,740
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			No, with a bondolan hilt you should better fit a Balinese uwer (ring) IMO. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Regards  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Keris forum moderator 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Aug 2006 
				Location: Nova Scotia 
				
				
					Posts: 7,250
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Athanase, the bondalan style hilt that you should be looking for is not the typical Balinese style. The Maduran form is a bit wide, sqautter, stockier if you will. This style is discussed a little bit on this thread as well as what may or may not be an appropriate mendak for such a hilt.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...light=bondalan  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2016 
				Location: Paris (France) 
				
				
					Posts: 428
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Ok, thank you very much.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 3,255
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 A bondolan hilt does not need an uwer. Regards, Kai  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 7,085
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Yes, you're right Kai:- a bondolan does not need a transition piece from blade to hilt. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	However, the complete keris usually is much more pleasing if a "keris ring" is fitted. It's a matter of proportion and perception.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2009 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,740
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Anyway the existing mendak is a Central Java model and should better be replaced. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Regards  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 3,255
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks, Alan! 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Since the proportions between hilt and gambar (as well as gandar) are already different, would you go for a uwer Bali (maybe a relatively narrow one?) or a Madura style mendak or even selut? Regards, Kai  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |