![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
![]() Quote:
this thing is too large for a bullet extractor. Some time ago I have read a very interesting german paper from late medieval about the treatment of arrow and bullet wounds. In most cases the bullet/arrow was left in the wound and they used different mixtures to cause ulceration (purulence), which brings the bullet out of the hole by itself or often by gravity. Roland Last edited by Roland_M; 25th January 2017 at 12:14 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 84
|
![]()
Hi Roland,
The more I look at this the more I tend to agree with you that this would be cumbersome to use as a bullet extractor though it follows the same principle. As for leaving the bullet in the hole there seems to have been multiplicity of opinion. For example Thom. Longmore in a Treatise on Gunshot Wounds 1862 states the following: On arrival at the hospital, where comparative leisure and absence of exposure afford means of careful diagnosis and definitive treatment, the following are the points to be attended to by the surgeon: firstly, examination of the wound with a view to obtaining the correct knowledge of its nature and extent; secondly, removal of any foreign bodies which may have lodged; thirdly, adjustment of lacerated structures; and fourthly, the application of the primary dressings. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 135
|
![]()
Perhaps culinary rather than medical?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 135
|
![]()
Just found an even closer match
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
That was my instinctive guess; just didn't want to disenchant the thread author
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
![]() Quote:
Thats pretty interesting for me. One reason could be the discovery of Morphine in the early 19th century. In Medieval and Renaissance times they only had alcohol, a leather strap between the teeth and/or a wooden hammer for "anesthetization". But lead is not very healthy inside the body. This might be one reason for the different treatment of shootet wounds. best, Roland |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 84
|
![]()
Hi Roland,
Clearly you may be on to something. In fact Dr. Longmore advocates the use of Chloroform as an anaesthetic agent although there is interestingly no mention of Morphine that I came across. He states: The complete applicability of chloroform on the field to injuries caused by gunshot, as to all others in civil practice, is established among Continental surgeons, and among a majority of British army surgeons. Thanks Robert. That settles the issue as to what it is though very curious that an Ice Grabber should follow the design of a plunger in a syringe. Best. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 84
|
![]()
Since we are on the topic does anyone have examples of arrow and bullet extractors?
Rgds. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
You may read out there that Morphine, being a strong analgesic, is or was used before induction or during maintenance of anasthesy, to potentiate sedation. Concerning Clorophorm, this was indeed a controversial composit but, there being apparently no alternative, this still was used as late as in 1950, having myself been put asleep with it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]()
In Eastern regions warriors wore a silk vest which following the principle that silk is stronger than steel thus there was a degree of protection and that on the outer armour being penetrated the silk material closed around the arrowhead enabling later extraction.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,284
|
![]()
In the Wild West, the old images of the fancy dressed gamblers wearing silk vests in the saloons made them look dandy. Truth was that it had been realized that silk was powerfully resistant to many bullet types, especially the cap and ball with lower velocity.
Most guns in the 70s and 80s west in towns and saloons were basically lower caliber and smaller 'pocket' type pistols as the wearing of guns openy was typically prohibited in town. In the early 20th the military was interested in developing bullet resistant vests and material using silk, however it was not pursued, probably cost? In one shooting instance in a saloon in c. 1880s, the attending doctor was astonished that a silk handkerchief on the victim had been carried into the wound, and surrounded the bullet but did not penetrate the silk. Unfortunately the wound was fatal, but bullet came out handily. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|