![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]()
I would be very impressed by a keris penetrating a Dutch breastplate. Not just a keris, but any one-handed stabbing weapon. Not so easy to drive a point through approximately 2mm of iron sheet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,048
|
![]()
Pretty well established that it did happen Timo, I have no idea at all of what Dutch breast plate is like, but the fact that Brojoguno keris did penetrate them is a part of history.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Don't know about keris, but European estocs were actually designed for stabbing through solid steel cuirasses. Even in the 19th century French cavalry was trained to stab rather than slash, and their opponents wore cuirasses ( not all, of course, but quite a lot). So yes, it was possible. And sticking 2-3 inches of steel inside any part of torso was almost guaranteed to be fatal.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,048
|
![]()
Now you mention it Ariel, yes, the cross section of this type of keris --- the Brojoguno style and his copiers --- is something like an estoc.
There is also a tombak that will pierce breast plates, it is the "sajen ampel" form, and it is a distinctly diamond shape cross section. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]()
Very interesting information. Thank you!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 84
|
![]() Quote:
Could this be the tombak you mentioned? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
I suggest an experiment: get some mild steel sheet, 1.5mm thick, and try to stab through it, with whatever one-handed dagger, knife, or sword you wish to try. That mild steel sheet is better quality (but thinner) than the lowest quality iron used to make cheap munition armours, and if the results in Williams, The Knight and the Blast Furnace, section 9, are good, it's about as protective as a cheap and nasty munition breastplate of 2.5mm thickness, or a mediocre breastplate 2mm thick (2-2.5mm thick is typical, for infantry breastplates). With a close-to-optimal tip for penetration, you can just penetrate (i.e., make a hole all the way through, but only just) that 1.5mm of mild steel with 80J of energy. Make that about 110J if you want to tip to go through far enough to be effective. This isn't easy to achieve, especially if the target is trying to avoid being stabbed. The best possible armour piercing tip doesn't make it easy (or depending on the breastplate, even possible) to pierce thick iron plate. Given that some armours will be thinner, will have defects, will have thin spots, etc., the best one-handed stabs delivered by humans, hitting square-on, should be able to occasionally go through (not against much-thicker cavalry breastplates, though). But there are some serious problems with trying that and hoping it will work as a fighting strategy. It's much, much easier to go around the breastplate than to go through it. There's plenty that it doesn't cover. What an "armour-piercing" tip will give you is a tip that will survive hitting a breastplate when you're trying to go around it. It's also a good tip for piercing chainmail (which was used by the VOC), or against armoured-all-over soldiers, piercing the much thinner armour on the limbs. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,048
|
![]()
You make a good argument Timo, but the problem is that Brojoguno keris were witnessed and recorded as having pierced Dutch breast plates.
What sort of Dutch breast plates? I don't know. How it was done? I don't know. Was the author of the babad (court history) lying? I don't know. Was it a political ploy to raise Javanese spirit? I don't know Perhaps your modern understanding of the mechanical qualities of material do undermine this piece of recorded history. But again, we have a problem, and that problem is Jawa itself. If something is believed to have happened, it did happen, and all the logic, reason and modern scientific understanding in the world will not alter that. Modern logical thought has no place at all in Javanese keris belief systems. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
It might be worth seeing what the oldest written sources say, whether they say "breastplate" specifically or just a more general "armour" (with "breastplate" being a later gloss). |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,048
|
![]()
Very well Timo, as you wish, its not a problem.
The point I have attempted to make, and have apparently failed to do so, is that reality has no place at all in this discussion. It is completely irrelevant whether or not a Brojoguno keris could actually make a hole in any Dutch breastplate. We are talking here about a system of belief:- think in terms of any major religious system of belief, or any culturally accepted system of belief. In a few days time Santa will come around, and if you are a True Believer, he will fill your stocking with goodies. But if you do not believe --- no goodies for you. But just to be on the safe side make sure your chimney is clear, or you've left a window open. Timo, we're talking "Keris", we're talking "Javanese Belief", we are not talking about whether one or more breast plates were actually pierced or not. The piercing is totally irrelevant. What is relevant is that Javanese people who subscribe to the Javanese Keris Belief System believe that Brojoguno Keris could pierce a Dutch breast plate. Now don't forget, on the night of 24 December, hang a stocking from the mantle piece, or even the foot of your bed, and leave a window open. Truly believe and Santa will remember you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|