19th June 2016, 08:25 AM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#25
			
		 | 
	
	| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2013 
				
				
				
					Posts: 2,145
				 
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		| 
			
				 
					Originally Posted by ariel
					
				 
				For myself, I choose the construction of the handle as the defining point. Blades were imported, decorations borrowed or just made by itinerant artisans, but the national character of the sword was  embedded in its handle.   
It was a hallmark of tribal beliefs and  tastes, it reflected the traditional  way of wielding it, it largely defined its techniques. 
 
 IMHO. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 Yes i totally agree for the handle and also the scabbard, but i think decorations are essential... Blades are traded or reused... I agree forget about them.
 
	Quote: 
	
	
		| 
			
				 
					Originally Posted by ariel
					
				 
				That is why shashka is Caucasian,  Kastane is Sri Lankan, Pulwar is  Afghani,  Lankan, Pulwar is  Afghani, Yataghan is Ottoman ( with even more ethnic variations), Choora is from the Khyber Pass and  Kattara is Omani. 
 IMHO. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 So true
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
	
		 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 |