|
|
|
17th June 2016, 02:40 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,240
|
Oh I understand, the collector was old, the friend was old, so the dagger must be old too. May be, but the bajonet M 1916 is old too
corrado26 |
|
|
|
17th June 2016, 03:16 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
Here is your M1916. Are you really sure, that this is the same blade? Roland |
|
|
|
|
|
17th June 2016, 03:40 PM
|
#3 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
17th June 2016, 03:47 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,240
|
This is not a M/16-LEBEL bajonet! Look at the foto of a Lebel-M/16 and compare
|
|
|
|
|
17th June 2016, 04:11 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
The Lebel has a round base but the base of the dagger is rectangular! The middle ridge of the Lebel is thicker than the dagger and finally the tip is completely different. I am sure, this blade doesn't come from a Lebel or another well known mass produced bayonet. Roland |
|
|
|
|
|
17th June 2016, 04:34 PM
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,240
|
Please, have a look to post 7
corrado26 |
|
|
|
|
17th June 2016, 11:07 PM
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,064
|
the dagger under discusion is a well kknown type of all steel roundel dagger , Germany around 1400.
this type of stabbing dagger is Long, around 40-42 cm. see pictures of the same type based on the Pictures, marks, excecution and extreme length, I tend with dating of this dagger more to a later reproduction, I think i have seen the dagger before but cannot remember where it was. |
|
|
|
|
18th June 2016, 05:30 AM
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,204
|
Good catch, Jasper!! I agree that it looks much newer. Historismus?
Mark |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
