Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 24th May 2016, 10:06 AM   #1
Cerjak
Member
 
Cerjak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
Default last latten inlaid

latten inlaid
Attached Images
  
Cerjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2016, 12:02 PM   #2
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Magnificent sword, Jean-Luc.
I wish i could spot marks similar to those, but ...
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2016, 03:53 PM   #3
Cerjak
Member
 
Cerjak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
Default

Hi Fernando,

Thank you for your kind comment,for the star I have found a similar on one medieval blade ( see http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=20883
Best

Jean-Luc
Cerjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2016, 06:03 PM   #4
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,284
Default

Hi Jean Luc,
Beautiful great sword!!! and for all I can see, in my opinion this may well be a Passau sword, and of the period you suggest. These latten markings could well have been punched in later, but certainly later in the 15th into 16th as the markings comparable I have seen date slightly later.
The 'heart' and cross was a known Passau inlay (Cronau, 1885 p.18; Kinman p.65) end of 15th c. but the heart was usually inverted from the cross.

The encircled cross is the cross crosslet it seems was earlier use and by the 15th century the cross fourchee encircled was more commonly seen. This cross form may well have been used anachronistically or aligned more with specific conventions such as order or other imbuement.

The 'star' is not really a star but appears an interpretation on the 'pi' marks used in Milan early, actually a crown atop two 'tails'. This is of course a highly stylized version, but these kinds of stylizations (common on latten inlays) were known used by Stantlers around early 16thc .

While the early 16th century seems late for these types of swords, it is noted that the forms often remained in use well after the period used in the classifications and forms could remain in use concurrently and transcending those guidelines. Thus more accurate dating is difficult based on style or even these markings which as noted might have been set later.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2016, 08:16 PM   #5
Cerjak
Member
 
Cerjak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
Default

[QUOTE=Jim McDougall]Hi Jean Luc,
the markings comparable I have seen date slightly later.
The 'heart' and cross was a known Passau inlay (Cronau, 1885 p.18; Kinman p.65) end of 15th c. but
.

Dear Jim

In this Sword from Nadrlje, Serbia we have the same symbols ( heart and cross only the location for the cross is under the heart.
Best

Jean-Luc
Attached Images
 
Cerjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2016, 03:35 AM   #6
Reventlov
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall
The encircled cross is the cross crosslet it seems was earlier use and by the 15th century the cross fourchee encircled was more commonly seen. This cross form may well have been used anachronistically or aligned more with specific conventions such as order or other imbuement.
A latten cross crosslet appears on the pommel of (at least) two swords of unquestioned provenance. One appearing in Oakeshott's Records was donated to the armoury of Alexandria in 1436-37 (year 840 in the Muslim calendar). The other was found in the River Tina in Northern Poland.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cerjak
The 'heart' and cross was a known Passau inlay (Cronau, 1885 p.18; Kinman p.65)
In this Sword from Nadrlje, Serbia we have the same symbols ( heart and cross only the location for the cross is under the heart.
Has any one ever seen a list or count of swords with this mark, or tried to compile one themselves? So far I have counted 10 examples... the swords I have found seem to be generally distributed in Eastern Europe; the western-most example is one in Germany (one of the Sempach swords), the rest I have found are the two in Serbia, and others from Poland, Slovakia... one is in the Hermitage, and one more was also from Alexandrian armoury.
Attached Images
  
Reventlov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2016, 06:15 PM   #7
Cerjak
Member
 
Cerjak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
Default

Hello Reventlov,

Thank you for your comment ,Do you have some pictures for similar marks ?
If yes could you post it here ?
best
CERJAK



Has any one ever seen a list or count of swords with this mark, or tried to compile one themselves? So far I have counted 10 examples... the swords I have found seem to be generally distributed in Eastern Europe; the western-most example is one in Germany (one of the Sempach swords), the rest I have found are the two in Serbia, and others from Poland, Slovakia... one is in the Hermitage, and one more was also from Alexandrian armoury.[/QUOTE]
Cerjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2016, 11:21 AM   #8
Reventlov
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cerjak
Hello Reventlov,
Thank you for your comment ,Do you have some pictures for similar marks ?
If yes could you post it here ?
Hi Cerjak,
Before I post photos, I feel like I should mention that we may have crossed paths before in the myArmoury forum - I post there under my real name: Mark Lewis.

Here is my list of swords with the heart/cross mark. All are long-hilted, probably classifiable as types XIIIa, XIIa, and XVIa. The group seems to generally date to the 14th century.

1) Recovered from the tomb of Friedrich von Greifenstein, killed in the Battle of Sempach, 1386.

2) From the Alexandrian Armoury, inscribed with the name of Aristay, governor of the city for a short time in 1400-01.

3, 4) Two found in Serbia, both now in the Museum of Jagodina - probably you read the same article that I did?

5, 6) Two from (different) museums in Warsaw. Apparently excavated within Poland(?).

7) An un-hilted bladed in Wroclaw. There is a stamp on the tang similar to one of the Serbian swords (posted above). The stamped letter is different however, possibly a reversed S?

8) In the Hermitage, source unknown.

9) Auctioned by Hermann Historica, sale #65, lot number #1352. From a "Munich private collection".

10) From Husina, Slovakia. Possibly should be excluded from the list, the mark is not exactly heart-shaped.
Attached Images
         
Reventlov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2016, 06:30 PM   #9
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

If Jasper came around i bet he might wish to add some conclusions on both sword and marks .
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2016, 06:52 PM   #10
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando
If Jasper came around i bet he might wish to add some conclusions on both sword and marks .
Thanks Fernando.
Hope so.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2016, 07:24 PM   #11
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall
Thanks Fernando.
Hope so.
Notwithstanding i find your assessments well in business.
I was paging the catalog of Schweizerischen Landsmuseum and latten-inlaid symbols not equal but suggesting same type of attitude, were practiced during the XVI century, as you pointed out.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2016, 10:46 PM   #12
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando
Notwithstanding i find your assessments well in business.
I was paging the catalog of Schweizerischen Landsmuseum and latten-inlaid symbols not equal but suggesting same type of attitude, were practiced during the XVI century, as you pointed out.

Looking forward to Jasper who has far more experience in these swords, and hoping my research is somewhat in accord.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.