![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() Quote:
Kubur |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,633
|
![]() Quote:
FRONT AND REAR WOOD OF THE BUTT STOCK: The wood on the rear of the butt stock is definately different than the wood on the grip area and forearm. but as Kubur mentios, this is quite common. It's a bit hard to tell in the photos because the gun really needs cleaned. But in this case, I believe the butt section was original to the gun. One reason I believe this is that the sharp edges of both pieces are rounded/worn equally. And the brass nails on the brass strap all match with the same patina. What is intersting is the butt cap section being held in by two wood dowels rather than long nails like you usually see. But I've seen many of these with both the same, and different woods used. If it was changed, it was certainly done back in the period sometime. But again, a good cleaning will tell me more. Rick. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,633
|
![]()
Actually, it's also missing one of the small brass decorations on the left side, and there are 3-4 small worm lines. But the brass will be easy to replace.
It is nice getting the original ramrod, which rarely shows up on these guns. Rick |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
It looks like the butt end was not cut evenly, is that just from the angle? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,633
|
![]() Quote:
No, it's just the angle of the photo. There appears a small, old repair on the edge. I'll take another photo so you can see. (as soon as my camera battery is recharged ![]() Rick |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|