![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,587
|
![]()
Truly astounding.....253 views on this, and no comments.
Gav, personally I thank you for posting this, and it was a great opportunity to look further into these Tibetan swords. Hopefully of those out there reading this, someone might have an idea or some information which might add something further. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 363
|
![]()
Very interesting and well made weapons! I wouldn't mind having one or two examples myself.
However, I would like to hazard a guess as to why there are so few replies. These weapons are so scarcely encountered and there has been so little published on them that most of us out here are totally unfamiliar! Tibet and Bhutan are so remote and removed from the discussion of history and politics that in many circles all you get is a blank look when they are mentioned. Only in recent times has tourism by more than a handful of westerners been readily possible. And only briefly in the last 100 years and in WWII has there ever been even minor Western military presence. I do not believe, (and I could be wrong here!), that either place has had any significant presence of Western missionaries. Back in the heyday of collection building in the 19th century, missionaries, military, and business tourism/exploration were the primary customary manner by which ethnographic material arrived on Western shores. Except for the few pieces making their way West via a small trickle-out along diplomatic or traditional trade, you just don't see them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,587
|
![]()
The things you point out are very true, and thank you so much for writing here. That was a thoughtful thing to do.
I can only speak for myself, in that these kinds of unusual and esoteric weapons are inherently exciting and all the more interesting for these very reasons. I am a desperately curious person, and obsessive research maniac ![]() My goal has always been to search, find, study and share information and to place it here in hopes of us all learning together. With the net these days it is unbelievable that I can find online things that used to take me months even years to find in the early years B.C. (before computers!). Many guys are discouraged from certain kinds of weapons because they cannot afford or find them. For me, I learned long ago that it was the learning, not the collecting that was my thing. The beauty of these pages is that I can enjoy and learn from the pieces other guys who can find and buy them. The added plus is that we all can. Thank you again for adding your comments here, very much appreciated. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
I agree. Tibet was always "forbidden place" for the Westerners. For centuries, their only outside contacts were essentially with China and Mongolia. The Younghusband expedition opened a small crack into it, but Japanese occupation of China and following civil wars once again made Tibet a very unattractive place to venture in.
And, finally, Chinese occupation... All in all, real Tibetan antiques and especially weapons are almost unobtainable. BTW, Tibet had very aggressive military policies centuries ago, but the current Dalai Lama conducted a brilliant PR campaign to re-market Tibet for the Western consumption as a peaceful paradise. Had it not been for LaRocca's book, most of us would have never known that there are such things as Tibetan weapons. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Here are 4 of mine.
A short Tse Psa ( Gavin calls it Ral Gri, and I am not going to argue, because AFAIK nobody really knows how to pronounce Tibetan words :-))) Then, a long palash Ke Tri ( ot Ge Dzhi, see above). Then an Eastern Tibetan palash And, finally a Kora, purportedly Tibetan because of its slender structure ( not sure if it is true). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,587
|
![]()
Ariel,
Thank you so much for the great input on this , and these very nice examples. Actually the term Gav uses is correct as I mentioned was included in conversations with Philip Tom and the data from LaRocca. All best regards Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
Nice Kora Ariel,
I'd be inclined to pin yours down as Tibet too. To my eye but without formal factual data to back it up, the rounded Stupa pommel arrangement, the form of the disc guard and the slender blade point to Tibet for me. I'd love to replace the very early Tibetan Kora I sold years ago but the wheels must keep turning so other treasures like the Tibet sword can be obtained and studied. Gavin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
Perhaps a new thread or an old Kora thread should be revived....this image of a Sikh holding a Kora, although a line drawing from the 19th century puts an alternative perspective on the early type when viewing the hilt.
Gavin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you for giving it a little bump to the top. Shakethetree and Ariel, thank you for entering the discussion, it is nice to see some life put in to such a rare and interesting sword and to view other examples. Ariel, Jim, I have not here or elsewhere that I can recall in recent times, referenced a native name to these sword types but Jim, you're spot on with the definitions as far as I know them. With reference to sword type names, I have attached photos from LaRocca's exceptional work, particularly the glossary of terms in the back of the book, see below. Shakethetrees, if you do not have the book noted, spend the $40-50 to own a copy, it might cure your need to buy the sword types. Gavin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Gavin and Jim,
I learn by osmosis:-) Ke Tri and Tsep Sa is something I absorbed from Artzi' site. Look there for "Tibetan sword" I have LaRocca's book and even happened to see the actual exhibition. I trust his references, but where did Artzi get his names? He did not invent them, after all. Dpa' dam is listed by LaRocca as Sked Gri. Is it Ke Tri, pronounced slightly differently? Are there differences between spear-pointed and hatchet-pointed blades? One needs to be born in in a monastery in Lhasa to figure out how to pronounce those convoluted strings of letters:-)))) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
In Donald LaRocca's excellent catalogue of the exhibition WARRIORS OF THE HIMALAYAS, the spellings used are the "academic" transliterations. Likewise, the spellings of Sanskrit words in Dr Robert Elgood's HINDU ARMS AND RITUAL are the transliterations used in scholarly texts; both can be more than a little daunting to laymen trying to pronounce them!
In personal correspondence with Mr LaRocca some years ago, I brought up the term "ke tri" and was informed that there was no such term applicable to the classification of sword types. In identifying Tibetan swords by blade shape, the three most useful and accurate ones for students and collectors seem to be ral gri (acutely pointed blade), dpa dam (parallel-sided, straight, oblique tip profile), and shang-lang (convex curve, i.e. a saber, rarely encountered). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Philip,
The same Donald LaRocca gives a variant name of Dpa Dam as Sked Gri. Isn't it the very same Ke Tri that we knew as a definition for straight , parallel sided, hatchet-pointed blades? You are right: academic phonetizations vs. "street" ones are always different. Professor Higgins made a living of it long time ago :-))) And on top of it, local accents and dialects add yet another level of complexity /confusion. Australian English vs. Glaswegian, vs. Southern American, vs. Midwest vs " Brooklinese" or Bostonian etc, etc sound differently . And each of them would be transliterated differently by well -meaning educated persons of different ethnic backgrounds and different native languages. Kilich, Klych or Kilij? Kard, Kord or Karud? Shashka or Chacheka? That would be just a funny "name game" had it not been the mechanism of "creating" artificial terminology for the allegedly different variety of weapons we are dealing with. Rather amusing, isn't it? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]()
Salaams All Tibetan weapons must be one of the most difficulot subjects in our entire ensemble thus I note how well this thread examines this extraordinary subject . I offer this from https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/tb...tbar.htmSwords
Quote."Swords were the primary handheld weapons in Tibet from at least the seventh up to the early twentieth century. In addition to their utilitarian function, they could also be clear indicators of rank and status, based on their quality or amount of decoration. In some situations, such as among the Khampa tribesmen of eastern Tibet, the sword was an essential part of male dress and still remains an important element of traditional attire. The sword also has rich symbolic significance within Tibetan Buddhism, particularly as the Sword of Wisdom, which represents the ability to cut through spiritual ignorance, and is an important attribute of many deities, such as Manjushri. Many Tibetan swords are distinguished by light and dark lines that make a hairpin-shaped pattern visible on the surface of the blade (36.25.1464). This was formed by combining harder and softer iron, referred to as “male iron” and female iron” in traditional Tibetan texts, which was folded, nested together, and forged into one piece in a blade-making technique called pattern welding. The hilts are often made of engraved silver set with coral or turquoise, or in some rare instances are intricately chiseled and pierced in iron that is damascened in gold and silver (1995.136)".Unquote. See also http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/13/ar...armo.html?_r=0 https://books.google.com.om/books?id...eapons&f=false Regards, Ibrahiim al Balooshi. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
A little further note;
The sword as noted above, is mounted in silver dress to the scabbard. Of particular interest to me is the way in which the sword is hung. Although the full suspension trappings are not present, there is an anchor point at the back of the throat akin to Bhutan swords and it is mounted with blade up for a draw cut, something I have never seen in a Tibetan sword but I am sure exist. The design elements to the silver are mostly unusual floral types with the drag showing two very long dragons entwined with a tree or vine, who then meet face to face with a large conch between their heads. Gavin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|