![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
According to the EK and the Pamoratlas this pamor pattern with a triangular motif at the base and pamor Adeg above it is called Junjung Darajat and said to originate from Madura or East Java. Personally I am not convinced that the void in the middle of the blade is intentional.
Regards |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 373
|
Thanks A.G. and Jean. The seller bought the hilt separately, and it is a replacement. The original hilt, not pictured, is rather plain and also wood. It looks similar to the hilt I have seen on many Keris. I will post a photo as soon as time allows. Thanks again.
Harry |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,250
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 373
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 373
|
Quote:
I'm not sure either. The seller thought it was. I'll post some close-ups as soon as time allows. Thanks for the info! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
The blade is Madura or East Jawa, most likely Madura, but even so, the pamor in the sorsoran has several possibilities, and at the moment I cannot see it clearly enough to be too positive about what I'm looking at, I'm not at home right now and I'm using a very small, very cheap notebook.
The blade crack probably started as a cold shut --- a welding flaw --- but would then have been preserved and refined to make it into a magically charged complong that will capture beautiful women and late model Maseratis for you, simply by looking through the crack at them and wishing. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 373
|
Quote:
Here are some close-ups of the blade. The seller thought the split was intentional. I think it adds interest to the knife, so if it was an accident, it was a fortunate one! Harry |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
Hello Harry,
Thanks for the pics, I maintain my opinion that the split is accidental but if you like it, that's OK! I attach the pic of a typical blade with combong, as you can see the void in the blade is due to the wear of the grooves in the sogokan. Regards |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
I agree with you Jean:- is is accidental, but it did not look like it does now directly after the weld failed. It started as a cold shut, an accident, but it was preserved and improved into a magical blade feature.
The thinking is:- this was given to us by God, who are we to refuse it? no, I won't try to get the weld to take, I will accept God's gift and enhance it. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,250
|
Jean, while i have often seen people refer to holes worn through sogokan by excessive access washing i do have to wonder if this was the original intention of the term combong (or complong). I have seen blades where such an opening is obviously the intention of the smith and have to wonder if people calling these worn out blades "combong" is just a way of adding special interest where none should really exist.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
Quote:
I don't know and frankly I have not a very strong interest in these blades If you search "keris combong" on Google you will find many pics of combong blades in the 3 categories (wear, welding flaw, and intentional). There is for instance a "special kamardikan keris" with an obviously intentional combong. BTW Dr Google does not seem to recognize the term complong and I must say that I never heard it. Regards Last edited by Jean; 17th November 2015 at 08:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
Oh David!!!!
You doubter!!!! Goodness,gracious me! |
|
|
![]() |
|
|