![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 428
|
![]() Quote:
You know what Indians added to the crucibles with the iron? What was considered as a secret? If you know, then you will understand why a crucible steel was called "flower steel", "fruit steel". It was magic for Indians then. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 428
|
![]()
Ok. No need to read my article or to study sources or to go to India to learn something. Let's play a game. A small equation with one unknown for primary schools:
[jeweled dagger WITH phull-katara] = [dagger decorated with gems] PLUS [X-blade]. It is known that dagger has gems (in which zone a dagger can has the gems?). And it is known that KATARA is a blade. JEWELED DAGGER WITH SOME BLADE. And wherein "phul" relates to steel. Well? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,399
|
![]()
Mercenary:
I'm having trouble following your comment here. Can you explain please. Ian. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 428
|
![]()
Dear Ian
I am sorry for confusion. I meant following idea. In context the term "phul-katara" itself was used only once or twice. The most part of cases when it was used are within a sentences as "jeweled dagger WITH phul-katara" or "with costly phul-katara". If you analize the text it becomes clear that "phul-katara" could not be an independent kind of daggers. It refers to the quality of the blade. Last edited by Mercenary; 15th October 2015 at 02:38 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|