Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11th October 2015, 10:29 PM   #1
Fernando K
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
Default

Hello

Two comments on what has sustained Ricky. The Spanish muskets, during the 18th century, followed the fashion of the lock to the French, in this case with some Spanish characteristics, the large ring on the screw that adjusts the jaws and striatum rake (Frizen) and recently in 1790 appears the lock of miquelete, although civilian weapons has been used long before. Remarkable is the absence of bridle into the bowl (pan)
Also, service weapon is owned by the Spanish crown, owned by the punch, REI. You can not be a French weapon.

It has not said anything about the method of carrying, the rings of gun carrier

Affectionately. Fernando K

Sorry for the translator
Fernando K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2015, 04:29 PM   #2
rickystl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,632
Default

here some pictures for one with French style lock that I ‘ve already posted 3 years ago.
Overall 152 cm Barrel 110 cm
Cerjak

Hi Cerjak.
WOW! Another super interesting musket. Yes, appears to be a 1757 Spanish musket - but with a French lock. Sort of the reverse of the first one posted. LOL Looks like the muzzle of the barrel had been shortened back in the period. Possibly due to muzzle damage or for civilian use. The lock plates on both the French and Spanish guns were almost interchangeable.
Two very neat muskets Cerjak. Thanks so much for posting.
Rick.
rickystl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2015, 04:44 PM   #3
rickystl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fernando K
Hello

Two comments on what has sustained Ricky. The Spanish muskets, during the 18th century, followed the fashion of the lock to the French, in this case with some Spanish characteristics, the large ring on the screw that adjusts the jaws and striatum rake (Frizen) and recently in 1790 appears the lock of miquelete, although civilian weapons has been used long before. Remarkable is the absence of bridle into the bowl (pan)
Also, service weapon is owned by the Spanish crown, owned by the punch, REI. You can not be a French weapon.

It has not said anything about the method of carrying, the rings of gun carrier

Affectionately. Fernando K

Sorry for the translator
Hi Fernando.
Supposedly, the internal and external bribles were added to the French lock in 1722. The 1752 Spanish musket was the compilation of the best features of both the French and Spanish guns. And as you note the "ring" on the top screw is a carry over of the earlier miquelet locks.
An interesting side note: From my own personal experience, I can say that the round ring on the top screw does in fact make aligning and adjusting the flint in the jaws easier and faster. Which is the likely reason the Spanish retained this feature.
Rick.
rickystl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2015, 12:07 AM   #4
Fernando K
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
Default

Hello, Cerjak
Regarding the post musket 18 (can not find the original post) should be considered if not a gun or a fortress wall. The 1728 model had this variant, but a larger caliber bullets 16 to the pound instead of 18 to the pound. The length of the shank to the muzzle and the lack of the bayonet lug would seem to indicate, though brass trimmings are now.
Affectionately. Fernando K
Fernando K is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.