![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 97
|
Thank you very much Rick.
Really very interesting all this informations. I have looked for some sign of the manufacturer or for some scripture but there is nothing of them.It is absolutely same in construction and decorative designs It is a pair where the michanism and barel is identical both arms and there is no difference in design and decoration . I've seen enough of this type in collections and museums but never one pair like this with both very similar. Stelios |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,633
|
Hi Stelio.
Occassionally, you will find an untraceable stamp on the lock. But usually these pistols are unmarked for reasons above. Your's were obviously made as a pair. And a very nice pair indeed. Warriors of the Ottoman Empire preferred to load their pistols with a seperate suma rod, as shown above, suspended with a throng around the neck. So the so called "false" ramrod design on the bottom of the fore ends was simply a styling excercise. Europeans would often carry a pair of horse pistols in a pair of holsters (called frogs) mounted on the horse saddles. Whereas, the Ottoman Region often preferred to carry their pistols in a single double frog holster suspended over the shoulder similar as shown below. Rick. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|