![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
there is a evolution to weapons. I doubt that every one in 1901 said I must make a choora today. If you were preparing a research paper on this I would expect more than the opinion of one expert. I would like to see possible paintings and museum acquisitions checked. I am always a little leary about some museums claims. They do not always know what they are doing. I would probably also look for early examples of what the knife evolved from. I agree the experts field is slightly off from what is being studied and the ageing of the items may vary from books. However I can not think of a similar expert it could be brought to that could do better. Also what was said was that the scabbard was studied by the expert and their opinion given of it. I guess that you could take a sample of the horn taken and tested for age. I am not sure how accurate or expensive that would be. I think that mahratt would be better served if he showed documented pieces of why his dating is correct and show the widespread use of the knife that this replaced. I do not say that ariel is absolutely right, but using Occam's razor it leads to him being more correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
Dear participants of the forum.
Before talking about the possibility of chooras in the 19th century: 1) Can somebody of you give the image an Afghan (Waziri or someone else) with choor before 1900? 2) Does anyone of you knowledge of chooras in museum collections, which became a museum exhibit before 1900? All other considerations, including the subjective opinions of experts - it is almost child's play "believe, do not believe," in which there is no serious evidence. For example. I ask an expert on the tree at the State Historical Museum in Moscow (Russia). I ask him, he can visually (without complex analyzes) to determine the age of a tree, exposed to the environment? He said that no one can do it for sure. Quote:
Quote:
You and I already know the alleged "Afghan knife" of the printed catalog Jacob.The subject, which is shown in Egerton - not Afghan choora (see image). I've said many times this Ariel Moreover, the fact that certain items Egerton called "choora" not to say that this is the Afghan choora that we are discussing. In the 19th century the word "choora" refers to a knife (a "knife" in general and not any specific knife).
Last edited by mahratt; 7th June 2015 at 09:08 PM. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|