![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,064
|
Quote:
very good find, it seems to me that an early 17thC shortened rapier blade is re-used in this 17thC small sword.This was done a lot during the transition from rapier to the much faster small swords, in the second half of the 17thC. (always shortened at the base not the tip!) an Italian origin for the blade under discussion is likely. best, Jasper Last edited by cornelistromp; 22nd May 2015 at 12:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,646
|
Hi,
Just noticed this mark on the tang. Unlikely to be a makers mark, inventory number?Hi Jasper, Thanks for finding the photo re Jim's post. My Regards, Norman. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,670
|
As always Jasper, your input here is outstanding and your experience with these weapons truly helps in better evaluating them and understanding key details. I very much appreciate your posting the example from Boccia & Coelho (my scanner is junk!).
As you note, and I misperceived, the tang on this blade does have the length to have been a rapier, and your assessment of date spot on..... with that......Norman I think you quite possibly have a true Ayala!! All the best, Jim |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|