18th Century? Sword identification

Bryan.H · 4th March 2015, 10:08 AM

Pommel nut

Bryan.H · 6th March 2015, 02:16 AM

Here's something stylistically similar in hilt configuration, (apparently from an Czech source?)

thinreadline · 7th March 2015, 02:05 PM

It has some similarities with the Scottish Officers cross hilt broadsword of the later 19th C ( see Robson pp184 / 185 ) although I do agree the grip is very 18th C .

M ELEY · 7th March 2015, 09:58 PM

I would guess early to mid-19th as well. Grooved ebony and fluted ivory grips were popular c. 1780-1820's (see naval dirks from the latter period). The hilt pattern is usually more seen on either non-military or dress type swords of the period (band swords, fraternal or officer's dress, Thin Red Line's excellent example of a Scottish claymore with the basket removed and the 'dress hilt' in place, etc.

Just a note-With the Scottish dress hilt, that particular sword had a screw nut at the pommel, allowing the basket to be removed and the cruciform hilt to be put in place. Your hilt seems more permanent, with the peened pommel cap. What's throwing me is the blade on yours, which is, as you pointed out, functional. Perhaps the hilt was replaced, again as you suspected.

Question- what is the stamp on the blade? Maybe if we knew more about the maker, country of origin, etc, we might glean more?

Bryan.H · 10th March 2015, 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by M ELEY

I would guess early to mid-19th as well. Grooved ebony and fluted ivory grips were popular c. 1780-1820's (see naval dirks from the latter period). The hilt pattern is usually more seen on either non-military or dress type swords of the period (band swords, fraternal or officer's dress, Thin Red Line's excellent example of a Scottish claymore with the basket removed and the 'dress hilt' in place, etc.

Just a note-With the Scottish dress hilt, that particular sword had a screw nut at the pommel, allowing the basket to be removed and the cruciform hilt to be put in place. Your hilt seems more permanent, with the peened pommel cap. What's throwing me is the blade on yours, which is, as you pointed out, functional. Perhaps the hilt was replaced, again as you suspected.

Question- what is the stamp on the blade? Maybe if we knew more about the maker, country of origin, etc, we might glean more?

Here's a better close-up of the marking.

4th March 2015, 10:08 AM	#1
Bryan.H Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Australia Posts: 51	Pommel nut Pommel nut Attached Images

6th March 2015, 02:16 AM	#2
Bryan.H Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Australia Posts: 51	Here's something stylistically similar in hilt configuration, (apparently from an Czech source?) Attached Images

7th March 2015, 02:05 PM	#3
thinreadline Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Wirral Posts: 1,204	It has some similarities with the Scottish Officers cross hilt broadsword of the later 19th C ( see Robson pp184 / 185 ) although I do agree the grip is very 18th C . Attached Images

7th March 2015, 09:58 PM	#4
M ELEY Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: NC, U.S.A. Posts: 2,204	I would guess early to mid-19th as well. Grooved ebony and fluted ivory grips were popular c. 1780-1820's (see naval dirks from the latter period). The hilt pattern is usually more seen on either non-military or dress type swords of the period (band swords, fraternal or officer's dress, Thin Red Line's excellent example of a Scottish claymore with the basket removed and the 'dress hilt' in place, etc. Just a note-With the Scottish dress hilt, that particular sword had a screw nut at the pommel, allowing the basket to be removed and the cruciform hilt to be put in place. Your hilt seems more permanent, with the peened pommel cap. What's throwing me is the blade on yours, which is, as you pointed out, functional. Perhaps the hilt was replaced, again as you suspected. Question- what is the stamp on the blade? Maybe if we knew more about the maker, country of origin, etc, we might glean more? Last edited by M ELEY; 7th March 2015 at 11:49 PM.