|
|
|
23rd July 2014, 10:03 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
Yes, Persian, and ceremonial...just a different style. I think I see "faux", or etched, wootz in the steel haft. Could we get a close-up?
Very nice piece. I believe this style was also immitated by the Sudanese. Last edited by CharlesS; 24th July 2014 at 12:36 PM. |
|
|
|
24th July 2014, 05:06 AM
|
#2 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,325
|
Yup - Qajar 19th century and etched.
|
|
|
|
|
24th July 2014, 05:13 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
Thanks both
And the Sudanese used these axes as battle axes against the British??? So it could be a battle axe??? Thank you for your lights Regards |
|
|
|
|
27th July 2014, 11:39 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 54
|
another example
Qajar axe looks early 19th century, photo I posted late 19th century.I too would say ceremonial use but the axe pictured has concelled spike not sure if it was added later in time.
|
|
|
|
|
28th July 2014, 03:16 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
That isn't etched, looks chiseled and pretty well too
|
|
|
|
|
28th July 2014, 03:18 AM
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
Oh ok two different axes. Last one chiseled
|
|
|
|
|
28th July 2014, 07:13 PM
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
Thanks!!!
Is it possible that your axe is Indian and not Persian? I have seen a lot of concealed daggers like that on Indian axes... Kind regards |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
