![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 437
|
Quote:
When I have a chance I will make mark up some photos to make things clearer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Forumite Adrian Roads wrote an excelent & comprehensive paper on the several tool patterns that were issued.
I hope he doesn't mind me uploading here a coupple pages of the said article . |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 437
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 135
|
Thanks Fernando I don't mind at all that you have posted this extract & would have replied myself if I had seen this thread sooner.
Dana, its an Enfield rifle tool, as has been correctly noted by several members, in this case one that was issued to Sergeants, these had a few "extras" that the Privates implements did not have, such as a ball drawer & mainspring clamp. There are several patterns of tool that it could be (No. 4, 5 or 7), as these have only slight differences. One clue will be as to whether or not it has a small screwdriver tip beneath the detachable worm? Regards, Adrian |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 437
|
Hello Adrian, it is a pleasure to meet you.
The Sergeants Tool in my post doesn't have have a small screwdriver tip beneath the detachable worm. Does that make it a 4 or 5? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 135
|
Hi Dana that would make it a pattern #4.
Pattern #3 is also the same as #4 except the arms & stem are longer, I don't think it is a #3, they are fairly uncommon, but if you check yours against the measurements in that article extract you will then know for certain. Regards, Adrian. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 437
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|