![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
tri-lobbed ballock dagger
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Just wonderful, Jasper,
Thank you so much for sharing! Best, m |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
I I remember it correctly I have never seen a three-lobed dagger before. So this one is just highly remarkable in my eyes!
m |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]() Quote:
The three lobes are THE reason I mentioned in post1 this type the mother of the typical landsknecht dagger . typical landsknecht dagger = picture d around 1460 this ballock dagger came also with three wooden lobes. picture a and the pictures in my previous post. A little later at the end of the 15th century the lobels of the ballock types were made of metal instead of wood. photo b. ( the classical ballock with wooden lobes also still exists next to it) This dagger type evaluates in the first half of the 16th century with three short pareers rods and a sandwich metal grip. picture c Alongside this type also the distinctive landsknecht dagger with three parry blades found live. picture d best, Jasper |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Perfectly argued and documented, Jasper,
![]() I have learned something new! Thanks, and best, Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,470
|
![]() Quote:
![]() It rather distorts the 'ballock' analogy yes? I always thought it interesting that particular anatomical allusion allegedly led the cautious Victorians to determine a less suggestive term by calling it a 'kidney dagger'. While the lobes clearly appear to be typically in two, I always wonder if there is any symbolic significance or is the configuration simply an aesthetic? With that, the triple lobe arrangement even more begs the question, why the lobes? Thank you both again for these fascinating topics and all that you both do in your phenomenal entries on these pages!!!! All the best, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|