![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,809
|
![]() Quote:
Hopefully more replies will expand on your thoughts. Regards Stu |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,809
|
![]()
????
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,719
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
I'm with Rick on this one...parts of a primitive tulwar reworked into its present state. It seems well-fitted, but many of them were. Afghan is an excellent guess. The toe piece on the scabbard like many of the Berber sheaths we've seen-
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|