![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
I find it is a very nice katar, although I find the pictures somewhat out of focus.
A thing which makes me wonder is, what is south India? To my opinion we have the NW, Punjab, Rajasthan, Deccan (the Deccan Sultanates) and south India. Correct me if I am wrong. Jens |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
Apologies for the pics. I am not the best photographer nor is my camera the best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Warwickshire, England
Posts: 150
|
Jens,
I'm not sure what your question is, but my email was me thinking out loud, so let me say clearly where I think it is from. I see influences from early South Indian Katars (Tanjore principally), but I think this has more Islamic influence, and therefore I would place it coming from the Deccan. I think the Deccan makers were good at fusing North and South together. I think the dagger I picture below is again from the Deccan, but takes the tiger tooth hilt from the North, and the blade from the South. Regards, Runjeet |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 608
|
With regards to the katar, all I can say is, "
!" It's an absolute stunner - if one was to have just one katar in their collection, IMO this would serve the role nicely! Quote:
South Indians generally consider Marathis (Bombay) as "South Indians," though I've met more than a few Marathis who consider themselves northerners (my word). I guess it all depends on one's perspective!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 415
|
Excuse me if this is a ridiculous question, but could the hilt be Bidriware? It seems an obvious material for a decorated hilt but I can't say I've seen many, or even any; perhaps it is too brittle.
I would be interested in opinions. Best wishes Richard |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|