![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
![]()
Hello Chris,
in fact the father never used the beehive as his marking. The son Ferdinand Hoppe (who took over the business) got it in 1847 by marriage to a Julia Köller, I suppose as part of the dowry. Since then the marking was used by S. Hoppe and Son(s). And regarding the epee itself: I think it was personal fashion to wear his own weapon rather then a regimentally issued one. I'm not sure (I collect fencing and dueling weapons, so the military is not my area) but I think that an officer wanted to show his wealth when carrying a personal weapon belonging to him. And of course he could take it home as a souvenir of his time in the military.... So far for today All the best William |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 523
|
![]()
Great information on the Hoppe business. Would the elder have marked his blades just S H ? That would explain to me why the bee hive mark would not have appeared earlier in the 19th century and also connect the S H properly for my own studies of eaglehead pommel swords.
Cheers GC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
![]()
Hello (again),
sorry for the long silence, I've just stumbled over this thread again and wanted to answer your question Hotspur: I don't know if Samuel Hoppe used the SH marking. It may be possible. Another option would be Simon Helvig. I'd bet on Hoppe. But the Solingen city archives have so far not given me any answers to this question (which I was asking myself too) so far. All the best William |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|