![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,345
|
One thing is that significantly smaller ones were used in combat, according to Cato.
The larger ones were used for beheading, yes, but think about the warning it would give - standing next to the datu in court would give the impression that he meant business so DON'T MESS WITH HIM! I would surmise that the bigger the piece, the bigger the message (as well as the size and skill to wield such a monster). BTW - the wrap looks new to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
I think Jose has nailed it on this one. It would be kind of like looking down the barrels of a 12 gauge shotgun, it is something that would definitely get and keep your attention.
Best, Robert |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,020
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
I wonder if this massive old blade may have been remounted at some point in its life. Some of the decorative carving seems a little fresh, especially when compared to the other example. The tang is sticking out quite a bit as well. It would seem with such a massive heavy blade you would want every inch of the tang braced in some way, especially if it were going to be done with decorative wire and bands.
I agree with Battara...this is a "look at how big mine is" panabas, designed to impress more than employ. It certainly is no jungle cleaver, at least not dressed out as it is. Regardless, magnificent, eye-catching example! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,020
|
Quote:
I think this type/shape of Panabas blades with the protrusions nearest the tang is supposed to be set this way with the tang sticking out a bit. See the other 3 examples of Panabas' with the similar blade shape. The size is imposing, I wonder how tall the fellow was that wielded this piece. I guessing this was probably made in the first third of the 20th century. Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,345
|
Perhaps when it comes to the socket, this is a style for this type of panabas.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Congrats
It is well known that there were giants of men amongst the Moro warriors....status, perhaps so, much in the same way the size of the Pershing Kampy appears to be Gavin |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 755
|
Very beatiful panabas !! and very big !! maybe too much to a warrior, I think maybe made to status signal.best regards carlos |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
Quote:
I had seen some of the carved swirls nearer the hilt and thought thay looked fresh, but clearly I was wrong. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|