![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 171
|
![]() Quote:
BTW attached were extra pix of hilt # 3, the full built and close up. I don't know what happen but it looks like he's having a bad measles there ![]() Regards, Moshah |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mother North
Posts: 189
|
![]()
Hi Mosha,
I'm not sure, but would think it could be because the nose is carved from the outer layer of cementum It also makes sense as it seems to be the most extreme part of the little guy. The transparency of the nose is what makes him so cute! ![]() The "mis"-colored one in the bottom pic is the same material as the others, IMO. Sometimes ivory just ages more beautifully than in other cases. It's the same if you look at the walrus hilts above - some become golden and lustrous with time while others become grey and 'dirty' looking. I guess it depends on what kind of life the material has had and which kind of environment it's been stored in. For this reason I in some cases personally find pieces of antler or bone more attractive than some pieces of ivory. I really love a warm and golden color and the aesthetic expression is more important to me in a piece, than the type of material. I've found a new pekaka hilt in walrus ivory for you, but the photo is from a dealers page, so I'll send you the link in a pm. We're not allowed to publically post pictures of stuff for sale, even if we don't reveal the source of the photo ...right? Take care, - Thor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Thor,
Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Thanks for the extra pics, Moshah!
Quote:
From the pics, the tip of the beak almost looks like a repair while the rest of the TIZ is obviously fine despite the unusual choice of placing it that close to the edge of the piece - looks like the carver was hoping to avoid including it but ran out of material... Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 171
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Since this material was dearly prized back then, I believe the carver's intention was to make the most from the chunk of material he got. Rightfully they were skilled artisan as well, as they wouldn't rush the process for $$$, unlike these days. Regards, Moshah |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]() Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mother North
Posts: 189
|
![]()
Hi kai,
No, unfortunately I haven't been able to photograph any cuts from dugong ivory. I have however, recently for the first time seen dugong teeth in person and to my great surprise they are solid with almost no central cavity - not hollow as I thought a lot of available photos seem to show. This has somewhat altered my opinion of what can - and can't be - cut from dugong teeth. I have taken photos of the teeth in situ and will upload them when I have a chance to dig them out of my archive at work. Regarding the ID based on laminations alone, I agree a 110% with you kai, that it's not a sufficient character alone. Detlef, until I have actually seen dugong ivory in some cut sections, my best guess would be that the hilt you show is carved from hippo incisor. It fits the concentric layers with the central dot as well as the general outline - see standard reference picture attached. If they exported the tusk to SEA , then surely it wouldn't be too far fetched to assume, that the incisors went the same route? - beautiful hilt btw! ![]() All the best, - Thor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mother North
Posts: 189
|
![]()
...the walrus one kicks major butt too - the color is stellar! Would you say that this one was tea-stained?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 171
|
![]() Quote:
Anyway, what's with the green smudge on the base, Detlef? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|