![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 436
|
![]()
Simon is spot on. Thanks for the input.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 11
|
![]()
Thank you Fernando and Dala for your kind comments.
I would agree that boxlock actions were incorporated into Queen Anne style pistols from the mid 1700s the pivotal emphasis being very much on the word style. The later boxlocks can only ever be considered stylistically similar to the earlier very distinct form of pistol which modern collectors have classified as Queen Anne. This distinction is reflected in the considerable differential between prices realised for such pistols when compared to that of a later "in the style of" boxlock. The boxlock whilst being both simple in design and compact did have certain limitations and was generally considered for use on relatively inexpensive pistols, even when offered by the best makers. Best regards, Simon. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Thank you for your new input, Simon
![]() It is visible that you know a lot more about these weapons than i do, who only once had a rather fine Queen Anne type specimen, eventualy witrh a side feather spring lock. My only book about these pistols is John W.Burgoyne's work, from which i took my previous posted observation. However it is this same author who says that box lock examples showed a a continuation of the very high standard of craftmanship and decoration observed with conventional Queen Anne style pistols. Many examples continued to have silver munted buttcaps and estucheons and the use of silver wire was common ... You will now understand that i was influenced to have a distinct perspective of the box lock version in these pistols. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|