![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
|
![]()
Can we assume that this is an extension of the original sheaths length?
If so, does it follow that these parts are cast and appear to have their decorations mainly from something like a lost wax cast? Or is that two big a stretch? Whats your opinion? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
![]()
hey Archer,
Am not sure why this is an extension? could be just part of the decoration maybe. Never the less, a very lovely piece! big congrats :-) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,800
|
![]()
Blade length to Hilt ratio looks correct so we must assume that knfe itself is not altered. The scabbard therefore would appear to be made for the knife, but I suppose COULD have been made in two parts, though I have not seen one made this way before.
Stu |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
|
![]()
Thank you for your interests, insights and comments. Time to wrap this one up. I've included a comparision photo of the same blade mounted in different styles. One was made for the blade and the other was modified to accomodate the larger blade. I think I'm just a bit closer to the casting therory the silver and gold sheaths all appear to be one piece versus the the brass copper and steel sheaths are two pieces soldered together.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|