Mixed Bag

nechesh · 11th September 2005, 06:13 PM

I know it can sometimes be misleading to take things at face value, but isn't this blade marked 2003? Is there any reason not to assume that is the date of manufacture.

erlikhan · 11th September 2005, 11:21 PM

yes but 2003 writes on the Arabic ones and Aurangzeb already accepts they are newly made. He's not sure about the kindjal.

Rick · 12th September 2005, 01:05 AM

Well , I guess we'll need a picture of the kindjal blade then .

11th September 2005, 06:13 PM	#1
nechesh Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Cincinnati, OH Posts: 940	I know it can sometimes be misleading to take things at face value, but isn't this blade marked 2003? Is there any reason not to assume that is the date of manufacture.

11th September 2005, 11:21 PM	#2
erlikhan Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Istanbul Posts: 452	yes but 2003 writes on the Arabic ones and Aurangzeb already accepts they are newly made. He's not sure about the kindjal.

12th September 2005, 01:05 AM	#3
Rick Vikingsword Staff Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 6,347	Well , I guess we'll need a picture of the kindjal blade then .