![]() |
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
Sorry Norman, in the heat of 'the fight' I forgot to comment on your 'new' tulwar
.Its a nice one with a very unusual blade form, which I don't remember to have seen before. I would say it is 17th to early 18th century, but as I have not had it in my hand, it is a bit difficult to say exactly. Jens |
|
|
|
|
|