![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
![]() Quote:
I will try to adjust it a bit, this first comment ref. to A.C. Tirri in his book "Islamic Weapons" most of "khyber knifes (to don't said ... all) recorded in his book, are declared 19th century the Khyber knife displayed by John seems similar, at least by the blade, the handle, it's an other matter ![]() I have read the following comments; - grip are usually made of horn, bone, ivory - blades of the better specimens are made of wootz steel - some early versions have a slightly recurved blade the handle from John's knife, doesn't match with general description now where I'm backing my friend Norman, it's about "authenticity" - unique antique Afghan Indo-Persian sword (as far as, they are hand made, all are "UNIQUE") ![]() - surely this must have belonged to a chief or tribal leader (absolute extrapolation , without a beginning of prove) ![]() - possibly an executionner's sword ? (pure phantasm) ![]() in short, just sales pitches without any technical merit and without valid references all the best à + Dom |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
I would simply observe that the pommel of this sword is in violation of the tenets of Islam; is it not ?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
![]() Quote:
Rick in the caracter of, a .... "Great Ayatollah" ![]() the Qajars, have had helmets with what it was supposed to be an "evil face" as well as their mace, horned devil in our days ... should be an other story ![]() à + Dom |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]() Quote:
Salaams Rick, Im missing something here.. ![]() Last edited by Ibrahiim al Balooshi; 14th June 2012 at 05:38 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]()
Salaams all~ It looks like a real one to me ~ The wear looks uniform and the hilt seems right... I saw a load of these in Kabul (Chicken Street) Ibrahiim al Balooshi.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,618
|
![]()
I saw a load of these in Kabul (Chicken Street) Ibrahiim al Balooshi.
![]() Hi Ibrahiim, This possibly reinforces my point? My Regards, Norman. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]() Quote:
Hi Ibrahiim, This possibly reinforces my point? My Regards, Norman.[/QUOTE] Its possible~ Afghans make all sorts of old new stuff.. but looking at the wear it seems old enough to include in 19th C ...Its not overdone decoratively which tends to happen to tourist knives/swords. The sword blade marks are peculiar ... Ive not seen them before which is a plus..ie not a popular copied style of blademark... The wear looks consistant but without being able to closely observe it... I think it wise to hold a decision in the 50/50 region. In Chicken Street you can commission a brand new one for about the same price... ![]() Regards, Ibrahiim al Balooshi |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
John
The hilt is all wrong never saw one like it. The sword itself lacks the quality often found in 19th century pieces. The hilt if was done in Afghanistan is not original and may have been added later in its life as a repair ![]() Lew Last edited by Lew; 14th June 2012 at 07:16 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,855
|
![]()
I never like to be quick on a verdict when it comes to non standard or unusual versions of weapons. Even in stones there are old kukries with tulwar handles. In northern Indian cross over happens. I think the handle and blade are a great match and each part are surley old. What I do have a problem with is the copper clout nail uesd to secure the handle. So I really hate to say it especially as I collect the odd stuff, this does not look right. You paid handsomely for this I would piont it out to the seller.
http://www.toolstation.com/shop/p84270 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
Hi John,
Sorry to also be a little negative about this piece. I had a good look at that piece in person when it was sold back in February at auction. I remember that there was some movement on the hilt and the general construction with the single copper rivet appearing to hold it all together seemed inadequate for the task. Not to mention the atypical to say the least design of the hilt and general 'feel' made me wonder if it wasn't either a marriage, 'put together' or a late piece made to impress those who travel. The blade looked to me to be possibly older than the hilt. The stamped 'decoration' looks to have been rubbed/worn/cleaned etc, suggesting age, while the crude bronze hilt seems to have remained relatively 'as cast'. That said, in it's defence it certainly does have a 'look' to it, and it also has size on it's side! ATB Gene |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
Ahh this piece again! I too have seen & handled it a few months ago... It is certanly interesting!
My perception in hand was a recently buffed mono steel blade from earlyish 20th century combined with an interesting cast head of some form, also combined with a badly cut & decorated piece of sheet brass pinned through with a single copper boat building nail or similar. It seemed to wrap over the bolster rather than fit to it. I presumed the cast head came from some other non Khyber sword item, added to the blade & with the sheet added to pull the design together.. I guess your at least the 4th owner in 4 months which isnt so bad as at least two of the others were proffesional dealers who etched it with ferric chrloride hoping to find wootz... {I am sure incidently there both members of this forum to. ![]() The handle is loose & rateley on the single nail pivot. I assumed the marrige of 3 parts was probably western due to the lack of traditional feeling. But certanly still dramatic! But I could be wrong & indeed perhaps thats the current level of some "chicken street" work, I dont know Ive never been there. ![]() I thought it was an interesting piece , very unique head on it & certanly a "massive" piece, its value? Thats up to the person who pays for it I guess? Spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|