![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kernersville, NC, USA
Posts: 793
|
![]()
I think the dark part of the hilt is indeed carabao horn. I zoomed in on your excellent photo of the hilt and the grain looks like old horn. See how at a couple of places you see lighter streaks that are almost very fine cracks? Also, it looks like a small "bug bite" where an insect has been eating the handle, common with horn. Of course, you have it in your hand and can see better than a picture, so it may be wood.
Very nice sewar! Steve Ferguson |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
I agree with Ferguson regarding the look of the hilt - looks like horn to me. Also now that I can see better in the pictures, the pommel looks more like bone.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 433
|
![]() Quote:
My imagination was seeing wood grain in the handle, but now I see that you are all correct. The grain lines all run parallel and looks fibrous like horn. I was wondering what that hole was. I also re-read the post by kai and looked closer at the temper line he was noting. I'm used to very distinct temper lines in modern forged blades so am wondering if I also jumped to conclusions concerning the "fuller" shadow causing the temper line. It is not distinct but the steel along the edge does seem to be bit darker. What do you suppose caused the grainy pattern in the steel. Did they use some kind of wootz? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 91
|
![]()
The ferrule looks a little Batak and the blade rencong-ish. Unusual and nice example to me.
Last edited by mmontoro; 13th September 2005 at 03:10 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]() Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 433
|
![]()
Adding photo since original photos (15 years ago!) are no longer hosted.
Any thoughts which Sumatran ethnic group this may have come from? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Jeff,
Thanks for rescuing this thread by making a pic available again! Could you possibly add some more close-ups, please? How good is the fit of the blade in the scabbard? Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 433
|
![]()
Unfortunately I don't have it with me, but here are the pictures I took in 2005. As I recall the fit in the scabbard is good though the "cross piece" portion of the scabbard is lose and slides off easily (this can be seen in the photos). This was collected along with a Batak pustaha which sadly was not also given to me! However I do not have evidence that they were collected from the same community.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Jeff,
Thanks for the additional pics! This is a tough nut to crack and will possibly need detailed personal examination for reliable results. From the pics, my estimate would be: 1. Genuine antique rencong blade from Aceh (these are known to have diffundated into more southern areas) 2. The hilt with silver ferrule vibes well with Karo Batak usage; might well be antique or possibly pre-WW2. How is the bone(?) end piece attached? 3. The carved motifs on the scabbard appear to be a somewhat later style that developed during the 20th century; it seems to often come out of workshops in Medan rather than traditional Batak regions. The type of crosspiece is not typical for any Batak group (also of Aceh origin originally). From the craftsmanship and materials, I'd be inclined to believe the scabbard is a post-WW2 replacement. Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|