![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 157
|
I forgot to mention that the muzzle decoration on both Jaipur marked examples is rather similar. Again I have no idea whether this is important or coincidence. Perhaps if others have similarly stamped examples we might get some clues?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
I chris
I Just bought one last week who is around 190 cm ,you could see the pics in my new thread.( very similar than your's) Kind Regards Cerjak |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 157
|
Hi Cerjak - congratulations on that toradar
The muzzle decoration is indeed very similar to mine and the other pictured in the post. Can't be just coincidence. Looks like you are lucky and also have a match holder on yours too! I'm not sure what it is but these are appealing somehow - not pretty but extremely functional. The numbers on the butt are very different from mine, so I guess this is another rack numbering or something. You don't seem to have Jaipur armoury marks on the barrel either - so we are at least getting some variety. Since the last post I have found another mother of pearl decorated gun with JPR stamps, a battlement gun with, and another without JPR stamps - unfortunately all three of these also eluded me ![]() I am still assuming/hoping somebody must know about these Jaipur numbers - when and why they were applied? Chris |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 970
|
Received in my e-mail:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|