![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jan 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 936
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The hilt is Indian. The blade is Persian, 19th C 'Qajar revival' ceremonial blade. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	But not a proper match for proper Indo-Persian sword, they do not belong to each other. You may even notice the base of the blade was narrowed to fit the handle.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jul 2006 
				Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE 
				
				
					Posts: 4,408
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Salaams all~ Late Qajari ( as late as 1920) Ceremonial blade on previously identified Indian Hilt. Interesting scroll or fabulous garden / tree of life decoration.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	  Regards, Ibrahiim al Balooshi.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2012 
				
				
				
					Posts: 462
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			here three sword persian revival period of my collection
		 
		
		
		
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Feb 2012 
				Location: Romania 
				
				
					Posts: 208
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			  Beautiful collection.  
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Ann Arbor, MI 
				
				
					Posts: 5,503
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The so-called " Revival swords"  are, IMHO, not real weapons, but rather ceremonial wall-hangers. They were made at the era when even Iranian military was feverishly rearranging itself to resemble the Western pattern. Imported blades and even locally-made blades of European construction were mounted on purely European-type handles.  The Revival blades are by and large far too thin  for real use, and the emergence of firearms was rapidly making even the quality blades obsolete. The profusion of cheap acid-etched decorations reminds one of similar Sudanese Kaskaras  and I would not be surprised if the Iranians actually manufactured those as well, as a mass export to the less technologically-advanced natives.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	And, of course, the backyard souvenir industry,- kula-khud, shield and one bazuband,- for the European visitors must have manufactured swords as well. Something to hang in the pub or on the wall of the drawing room. There were, of course, higher quality items, but even now one can buy a junky "Versace" and a good quality "Versace", both made in Hong Kong. I have some Persian swords, but would not touch any "Revival" ones. This one, as was already mentioned, is attached to a totally-unsuitable handle. IMHO, this is a "mix-and-match" creation of a relatively recent arrangement of available cheap spare parts. Sorry for being harsh, but an honest question deserves an equally honest answer.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |